Experts emphasize the importance of using multiple liver function assessments for more comprehensive patient evaluation in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.
Amit Singal, MD, reviews analyses of the HIMALAYA and KEYNOTE-240 trials, focusing on the impact of liver function via ALBI grades on treatment outcomes and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Rachna Shroff, MD, MS, FASCO, shares data from the CARES-310 study showing improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with camrelizumab and rivoceranib compared to sorafenib, regardless of liver function.
The ALBI score, originally developed to stratify cirrhotic patients undergoing resection, has evolved into a vital tool for assessing prognosis and treatment efficacy in various stages of hepatocellular carcinoma and is now being explored for its utility in other liver-related diseases.
Arndt Vogel, MD, explains that the Child-Pugh score, although simpler to calculate than the ALBI score, sometimes lacks granularity in assessing liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma patients; however, both scoring systems are considered valuable tools in clinical settings and trials for evaluating liver function's prognostic impact on treatment outcomes.