people are thinking about what it means forthis trump appointee who has been rebuked by the 11th circuit for her law free judgment earlier in this case about the nature of those documents and whether or not they could be disclosed in certain ways. so there s a lot more that could happen here, but yes, this was a very damming indictment, very well done. we ll see what happens going forward. on the two altitudes you mentioned, the public is getting all the information we re sifting through. the jury must only under the rules look at the admissible evidence in the proceeding, and that can be structured in a way that has a great impact, right, so you re saying if for example, damming material is removed for whatever reason, and sometimes there are good reasons for that, i m over on time, but ankush do you have a feeling about mock trials? i always thought they were fun. i share the professor s view. if we re going to have a trial,