along with analysts chuck rosenberg and lisa rubin. what can we expect based on arguments put forward in advance by both sides? reporter: to set the scene, because donald trump is here in person the security has really been ramped up. there s a much greater police presence. in terms of in the courtroom, this is a long shot for donald trump, this idea that a former president can t be prosecuted for any acts whited while serving in offense, it s belied by the fact that gerald ford pardoned richard nixon. this three-judge panel is an all-female panel with two judges appointed by president biden and one appointed by former president george h.w. bush. in addition to arguing immunity, trump lawyers are also making the argument that this produce is improper under double jeopardy. ken, i need to interrupt you because the hearing is starting. let s listen in right now. our jurisdiction was challenged by an amicus. you are not questioning our collateral order jurisdiction? [indis
case johnson is between legislative acts and nonlegislative acts. the distinction in ex parte virginia is between judicial acts and nonjudicial acts. that phrase is used in here, the distinction is between presidential acts and nonpresidential acts and everything that is alleged in the indictment is a presidential act. your honor go ahead. may i? there are a number of precedents or cases in which the supreme court has reviewed actions by the president. the case of youngstown by the supreme court reviewed harry truman s seizure of the steel mills during the korean war. there is the case of little buream where chief justice marshall reviewed the actions of president adams when he seized certain vessels. how does that square with your