to weapons and military. this place that you are looking at right now, the presidential palace, this is the same location where president biden gave a speech last year, one month into russia s invasion into ukraine. he gave a speech talking about what he believed the broader implications were, not just for ukraine or russia, or for eastern europe, but really for the entire wrorld, but there wa a moment at the end of the speech, a comment he made that got everyone s attention. this was the moment. ukraine will never be a victory for russia. people refuse to live in a world of hopelessness and darkness. we will have a different future, a brighter future rooted in democracy and principle, hope and light, of decency and dignity, with freedom of possibilities. for god s sake, this man cannot remain in power. it was a moment that captured headlines worldwide. ambassador taylor, you watched that moment as well. you know as well as i do, the ambassador had to come out and say the
and affirm western values rather than rebut russian president vladimir putin s speech which we heard this morning. that s right. dueling speeches. in that speech the russian president blamed the u.s. for the escalation of the war in ukraine. of course it was russia that invaded ukraine a year ago this week. putin also announced that russia would officially suspend its participation in the new start nuclear weapons treaty. we should note the state department said last month russia was already not in compliance with that treaty. the question now is what happens next. this morning the polish president andrzej duda rolled out the red carpet for president biden. they sat down for a closed day meeting one day after biden s secret visit to kyiv. i would argue nato is stronger than it s ever been. as i told president zelenskyy when we spoke in kyiv yesterday, i can proudly say that our support for ukraine remains unwavering. we begin in warsaw where president biden will speak i
content being posted by third parties on their sites. they argue the content is what makes it possible to find the needles in the largest hay stack. section 230 does not apply to how content is sorted, and would lead to a litigation minefield. noemi s parents allege youtube aided and abetted isis and should not be able to hide you behind section 230. they should stop it. they have the power to do it. reporter: this will be the first time the supreme court has considered the scope of section 230 and the extent to which it protects social media companies. the push to reform section 230 is widespread. last month, president biden penned an op-ed in the wall street journal asking for modifications, and big tech has been blasted for conservative ideas. the gonzalez family though, just
content posted by third parties on their sites. google argues its algorithms recommending content are what makes it possible to behind the needles in humanitarianities largest haystack warning in section 230 does not apply the internet would devolve in a mess and a litigation minefield. there is no evidence the paris attackers were specifically radicalized on youtube but her parents allege they aided and abetted isis. they should stop iter in this will be the first time the supreme court will consider the scope of 230 and the extent to which it protects social media companies. the push to reform 230 is widespread. last month president biden penned and op-ed calling for modifications and republicans have repeatedly blasted big tech for what they call alleged censorship of conservative