a few, or one at least, and deal with that because of common sense would say don t go to war with israel, which has at least, as president carter said, 300. i think they may have even more. what do you make of that argument? our administration rejects today that deterrence would be safe enough. the democrats and the republicans, i think, both run a little bit scared of the hawks who favor, you know, a stronger assertive policy on this. they don t want to be accused of selling out israel if they are not as strong on iran as some would like. the interesting thing on this, chris, if you go back a couple of years, a great israeli newspaper quoted the israeli chief of massad saying if iran gets a nuclear weapon, it s not an existential threat to israel. he wasn t happy about it. isn t it great in israel? you ve been over there and i ve been over there, you can actually have free speech over there on these topics, you can have different opinions.
they were so forceful in saying no. and he did not think any of them would take that risk. that s exactly what defense attorneys do, defend clients who may not be every single document available to them, including private communications from bridget kelly s private e-mail to government accounts. if there was any evidence, a single e-mail that said, hey, governor, we re going to do this in order to mess over the mayor of ft. lee, ain t it great, they would have brought it forward. and there was no such communication i grant you, this does not exonerate him. i think you re missing this is part of a process. and that we have someone, a third party that has looked at all this information. it s not a third party. wait, wait. this is the time this is the least chuck has lots to offer and poor chuck over here talk, chuck. we asked all of you for questions and we got this on
they were so forceful in saying no. and he did not think any of them would take that risk. that s exactly what defense attorneys do, defend clients who may not be every single document available to them, including private communications from bridget kelly s private e-mail to government accounts. if there was any evidence, a single e-mail that said, hey, governor, we re going to do this in order to mess over the mayor of ft. lee, ain t it great, they would have brought it forward. and there was no such communication i grant you, this does not exonerate him. i think you re missing this is part of a process. and that we have someone, a third party that has looked at all this information. it s not a third party. wait, wait. this is the time this is the least chuck has lots to offer and poor chuck over here talk, chuck. we asked all of you for questions and we got this on
how can it be a whitewash? you are now talking about so many reputations at stake here. they came out. they were so forceful in saying no. and he did not think any of them would take that risk. that s exactly what defense attorneys do, defend clients who may not be every single document available to them, including private communications from bridget kelly s private e-mail to government accounts. if there was any evidence, a single e-mail that said, hey, governor, we re going to do this in order to mess over the mayor of ft. lee, ain t it great, they would have brought it forward. and there was no such communication i grant you, this does not exonerate him. i think you re missing this is part of a process. and that we have someone, a third party that has looked at all this information. it s not a third party. wait, wait. this is the time this is the least chuck has lots to offer and poor chuck over here talk, chuck.
meant. how about a production shooting in my apart ament? i am desperate for work, but not that desperate. andy is it better to stay at one company for 25 years or move around a lot? it depends on-the-job and the reason. if you stay in your job because you like. it great, obviously. if you stay at your job, but you hate it and you have no other options that s not great. when you are young you don t have a wife orchids. you are not responsible for anyone but yourself. you can a jump from job to job to find something you like. something you might not be able to do when you are older and you are responsible for other people. then you may be locked in because you can t afford to start over somewhere. you are so provincial. no one you know has kids under the age of 30? this is 1826. that s true. it is good to have more jobs. when you are young you are more likely to tell your job to kiss your ass.