When we cannot deter, we have to think about collective defense, but the point is this defense has to be collective. Nato has been defined by values and by common goods, security being a common good, not by the threats or the challenges. What i mean is, whatever the challenge, whatever the challenges, the common good we want to protect is the same. So in that respect, we have to be able to interpret, not even extensively, but to update the concept of our attack. The part made here about no military warfare being possible today without cyber dimension, about space, its a clear case for considering these dimensions as part of nato responsibility. It may well be that some of them require nato to work with other organizations or other forums, but there has to be they have to be present also in nato. The bottom line about where we can deter and where we cannot deter is westfallion plus International Environment is two stages. Even if the most democratic one and the most authoritarian dictat
When we cannot deter, we have to think about collective defense, but the point is this defense has to be collective. Nato has been defined by values and by common goods, security being a common good, not by the threats or the challenges. What i mean is, whatever the challenge, whatever the challenges, the common good we want to protect is the same. So in that respect, we have to be able to interpret, not even extensively, but to update the concept of our attack. The part made here about no military warfare being possible today without cyber dimension, about space, its a clear case for considering these dimensions as part of nato responsibility. It may well be that some of them require nato to work with other organizations or other forums, but there has to be they have to be present also in nato. The bottom line about where we can deter and where we cannot deter is westfallion plus International Environment is two stages. Even if the most democratic one and the most authoritarian dictat