have interrupted. commissioner hwang: it is okay. i see the declaration of lwana cho. it looks like a print out of attendance related documents. the reason i am looking there is i am also looking for a summary of hours you missed per year. you submitted a declaration with your attendance record, did you have a calculation or summary of those hours and days you missed your regular job? that are not listed separately. they are not listed separately. but it shows from 2005 to current the number of days that i was on disability. i am wondering if you have an aggregate number so i can equate them. if you are looking for hours crediting, i just wanted to see. could you council put that together for you? if i may respond to that, i apologize. the way this works is linus oha tells me there is somebody at dpt who may have the intermission. it takes a long time to track down the documents. there is a key in the declaration of what those entries mean. when mr. linus oha should hav
those into your findings. or the board could meet its own findings. commissioner fung: i think that is important. i will recommend it. is that part of your mission? commissioner garcia: it was. president peterson: call the roll on that motion. this is a motion to uphold the revocation. the hearing officer s findings are adopted. again, the motion was from commissioner garcia to uphold this replication with adoption of the hearing officer s findings. on that motion, commissioner fung aye. the vice president is absent. president peterson and commissioner hwant, president peterson: welcome back. we will move on to item eight. call that item, please. appeal no. 10-021, linus oha vs the department of texas. it is an appeal of the denial on to europe 18, 2010 of a taxicab medallion, permit type p16. president peterson: i will start with the department. good evening, members of the board. i am with enforcement and legal affairs for the sfmta. this is the issue regarding linus oh
in the industry. as a matter of fact, i am on the third van, the fourth band since 2001. it happens that due to the regulatory process i do not pay off each of them before it is removed and a new one is produced. i am still in the business. that has made me accumulate a lot of that. i had to be doing it thinking i would pay off my debts when i get the regular medallion, which is a less expensive vehicle to use in the industry. when it came to my time to get it and they have used the hours to try to deny me the medallion commissioner fung commissioner fun commissioner fung: i am sorry to have interrupted. commissioner hwang: it is okay. i see the declaration of lwana cho. it looks like a print out of attendance related documents. the reason i am looking there is i am also looking for a summary of hours you missed per year. you submitted a declaration with your attendance record, did you have a calculation or summary of those hours and days you missed your regular job? th
some findings of fact that it was warranted. if you agree with the findings in the hearing officer s decision, you could incorporate those into your findings. or the board could meet its own findings. commissioner fung: i think that is important. i will recommend it. is that part of your mission? commissioner garcia: it was. president peterson: call the roll on that motion. this is a motion to uphold the revocation. the hearing officer s findings are adopted. again, the motion was from commissioner garcia to uphold this replication with adoption of the hearing officer s findings. on that motion, commissioner fung aye. the vice president is absent. president peterson and commissioner hwant, president peterson: welcome back. we will move on to item eight. call that item, please. appeal no. 10-021, linus oha vs the department of texas. it is an appeal of the denial on to europe 18, 2010 of a taxicab medallion, permit type p16. president peterson: i will start with the departme
their teas were crossed and their eyes their t s were crossed and their i s were dotted. i tend to uphold the department. it is so moved. president peterson: on that motion, would the commission be making findings adapting the adopting the hearing officer s findings? commissioner garcia: those would be my feelings. commissioner fung: you want to indicate we require no abuse and no error in this decision. i think he would need to make some findings of fact that it was warranted. if you agree with the findings in the hearing officer s decision, you could incorporate those into your findings. or the board could meet its own findings. commissioner fung: i think that is important. i will recommend it. is that part of your mission? commissioner garcia: it was. president peterson: call the roll on that motion. this is a motion to uphold the revocation. the hearing officer s findings are adopted. again, the motion was from commissioner garcia to uphold this replication with a