Kelly watts. When you come up say video and theyll put it on for you, kelly. Sfgov i have a video, no audio. This vid you shows footage of the tire particles children are exposed to on San Francisco synthetic fields today. The video also contains pictures and video of the rpd installation. In many cases shown on mbc, espn and [inaudible] cpsc meetings. Electron microscope [inaudible] these particles are invisible to the naked eye. Zooming out reviles the zaged edges that enables them to get stuck in the lungs and gastrointestinal track. Even the lanchlgest particles which are easily seen are the size of a grain of sands. The commission is responsible for introducing thousands of tons into childrens play fields and 35 acres of the city environment. That is millions of pounds. This commission is responsibleas you know, yale publuxed a study which found 12 cancer causes particles. Despite you and your Business Associates other notable agencyerize not sure. The health risk are questioned b
Nixon had a movie on the wall that showed the campaign. He had an idea that people would write down the questions and pass them on and they would answer just the questions the staff wanted them to answer, but it looked like they only came from the audience. So these are all yours. I might put them in a certain order, but i promise not to edit them. So one of the questions that we have is would the Civil Rights Act have passed if nixon had won in 1960 and 64 . I think it probably would have, because in 1957 when the Civil Rights Act was pending on the senate floor and lbj scaled it back and compromised, dropped entirely this provision that would have allowed the attorney general being sued and compromised the jury panel, effectively all white juries in the south, nixon was close to tears. It seems so paradoxical now, but he had a good record on civil rights. In 1960 when Martin Luther king was in jail, nixon didnt do it because he thought it would look like a grandstand play and he didn
Package are both the sides as well as some slides on injection drug use and the program that the city has to address those because you asked that before. Tracy packer is sitting here and available to answer any questions that you may have about this. I want to mention tracy is also a important member of the Population Health hiv working crew that you see listed on the slides and with two members of the gain to zero [inaudible] so im going to tell you a little bit about this collective impact initiatives. The question is, why this, why now, why us why we tried to get to zero new hiv infections zero associate hiv gas and zero associated stigma. So i would say that i think we have one of the best if not the best hiv surveillance programs in the world and certainly nationally. We have this Extensive Care Network that includes both clinical care, community care, and care for a number of other kinds of issues like needle exchange. We had from the beginning of the epidemic really Strong Commu
Item and id be happy to answer any questions or dr. Chow our commissioner singer if youve anything to add to that. I think i would add for commissioners to be aware that the committee is rewriting the process for the review of contracts that currently [inaudible] at 500,000 will cover 90 percent of our contacts at cost. It actually would then allow us to really look at a lower number of contracts themselves and can do better. And im courage you all look at what will be the draft proposal that will come to the finance committee and hopefully den we will then at the finance committee at next months meeting bring it to the commission for its approval so that it can be put into place for 2015. We are looking at a half year period of time for assessment to see what other additional parameters might be used to make this a more effective review and a more collaborative review with the department. So the 1 million special that was proposed we are currently speaking about using a 500,000 thresh
Figure out what are the issues, what are the roadblocks to getting this done and how to use it collectively impact approach to actually address it. I hope that answers your question. What we did was it just took a core group of us coming together and saying, we are going to move this forward which is invite a bunch of people and see if they are game and they were. They been very committed and really working very hard on this. Dana van corder and jeff sheedy are here and there are bringing an honest amount of expertise in terms of how we structure things. So, i would say that i understand science more. They understand the structure and the Movement Forward in engaging other partners. I know that jeff is going to talk with some google executives and dana has contacts with some of the companies that produce pharmaceutical companies. So we are just trying to use everybodys strengths and everybodys contacts to really bring this together. Dana has got an honest amount of expansion project in