their case and under what are we really talking about here. is it some supposition that he was less than forth right or did he lie and they have proof of those lies? those are two distinctly different things. if it s the latter, the fbi that i knew acted under the longstanding expectation and this went pack before louis freeh, when louis installed what was known as the bright line policy. if one of the two bright lines that if you were to cross, one was lack of cantor, you were to be fired. let s bring in bernie real quick. i wonder what you say to all of that. because what i hear people saying tonight is the swamp is being drained. the look. the attorney general has to deal with this. i would urge the american people to think extremely highly of the fbi. the fbi agents across this
their case and under what are we really talking about here. is it some supposition that he was less than forth right or did he lie and they have proof of those lies? those are two distinctly different things. if it s the latter, the fbi that i knew acted under the longstanding expectation and this went pack before louis freeh, when louis installed what was known as the bright line policy. if one of the two bright lines that if you were to cross, one was lack of cantor, you were to be fired. let s bring in bernie real quick. i wonder what you say to all of that. because what i hear people saying tonight is the swamp is being drained. the look. the attorney general has to deal with this. i would urge the american people to think extremely highly of the fbi. the fbi agents across this
this talk of a looming u.s. china trade war is burke s biggest concern. the newly announced steel and aluminum tariffs, not to mention chinese solar products and looming investigation into chinese intellectual property theft could signal what many awaited, hard line rhetoric on the campaign trail turning into harder line policy. but china will not take that lying down. the soybean export council told as much by chinese officials during a september meeting. increased trade tensions, soybeans could likely be a potential target in any type of chinese recaliation. restrictions on access could devastate uss industry. not just soy, other industries and companies could be targets, too. think apple, boeing, cisco, pawns in a trade war with lots of influence back home. they understand very clearly the political pressure points in the u.s., whether it s in
thanks very much for breaking it down. the european union may strike back if the president follows through on the tariff plan. they could retaliate by putting their own tariffs on levi jeans, harley davidson motorcycle and boshon whiskey. china, they could tax soybeans or squeeze companies such as apple, intel. matt rivers is live in beijing. matt, what are you hearing there regarding the reaction and things to come. so far the reaction in china has been relatively muted because frankly aluminum and steel are not the kind of exports china relies on to make sure their country stays healthy. if this signals a tougher line policy of the administration toward china, there s a lot the government here could do that would really hurt u.s. industry. we ll be imposing tariffs on steel imports and tariffs on
with the list of counter measures, already. they sure have. mr. trump s move is rattling u.s. trade partners. matt, where does this put u.s./china relations? is there anymore damage there? this one individual move won t change the relationship that much. the chinese government has been expecting something to come out of the trump white house. if you remember what the president said on the campaign trail, i think they expected this kind of move a long time ago. i think you have to take this move as a signal toward more harder line policy from washington toward beijing. that is something that could have a long term effect on the bilateral relationship, if the trump administration goes further than this, if they put tariffs on the products this country relies on, absolutely, that will have an extremely negative effect on the