john mccain, lindsey gray ham and joe lieberman. mccain left but that leaves lip si graham and lieberman to carry the water. they fear the iran deal has all but guarant they don t want that and are arguing the case against that happening. nebraska run senator agrees with these gentleman and worries what is being set by design here. first, senator always good to have you. thanks, neil. john kerry indicated today that the u.n. security council has voted for this unanimously. so the congress thing is just a side drama. this is a done deal. by that measure. do you agree? no, it s obviously not a done deal. but even by the low standards of washington this is a condescending way to treat the people, because what we should be doing is having the administration make a long-term argument about u.s. national security to the american people, and instead they re more preoccupied with russian and chinese bureaucrats.
very responsible in handling this information. but the americans government has hidden things. you haven t seen somebody s affair come out somebody s calling some bad person, somebody gambling. they are enormously careful with this information. this information is in the hands of some of our biggest patriots. when you look at a rand paul, could you picture support him as your commander in chief. very, very tough. for me the most important issue to face as america is islamic extremist terrorism. ennarrower. it s iran. i agree very much with lindsey gray him graham today. if you can pick one regime we have to take out it s the iranian regular anytime. why? they re the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world. they re now creating an empire
opposition extremists used the gas to get the u.s. involved. either of the last two scenarios would mean that some chemical weapons are not under bashar al-assad s direct control and that may mean another red line was crossed. jon: what is the republican response to all this. reporter: arizona senator john ma chain and south carolina s lindsey gray many ha both say the chemical weapons reports shows the obama administration should have got even more involved some time ago. they ve been pushing for a no-fly zone to protect opposition forces in an enclave in syria and to send u.s. weapons to the opposition. mccain thinks the president s demand nor more evidence is an excuse not to act. they say we need to have more information, et cetera. it sounds like the british didn t, sounds like the israelis don t and the fact it that should it surprise anyone that bashar al-assad would be using chemical weapons? he will use anything that he can get his hands on in order to stay in power.