after more than six weeks of testimony, the casey anthony trial enters its final fachlts first up, jeff ashton targ into the testimony that george anthony covered up the testimony the of george anthony. it s a trip dune the rabbit hole. where men find their granddaughters and do nothing. where men who love their granddaughter take an accident, a completely innocent act and make it look like a murder for no reason. he was hired by the state. then defense attorney jose baez takes aim at the state s lack of evidence. fantasy searches, fantasy forensics, phantom stickers, phantom stainsing all of this nonsense and no real hard evidence. prosecutor linda drain byrdak has the final say. my biggest fear is that common sense will are be lost in
family home, right? yes, ma am. but if there is a bombshell moment for the defense, it s this. if those computer entries were made, then i made them. cindy anthony reveals that she was the one, not casey, who did searches for chloroform on the computer. it happened while she was looking up the word chlorophyll. both the dogs would eat the bamboo leaves out in the back and i started looking up chloroform i mean chlorophyll and that prompted me to look up chloroform. that was a tour de force moment in this entire trial because in one fell swoop there goes first-degree premeditated murder. then prosecutor lynn draw drain byrdak put cindy anthony to the test. were you on the website 84 times? i don t know. did do you 84 searches for chloroform on your animals? i didn t do anything.
and so, did linda drain byrdak bring it together? well, she impressed me big time. both of the prosecutors have done a good job throughout the trial, and ashton was amazing and not that good this morning, but linda drane-burdick brought it home and i m not worried about a first-degree verdict here, because this is the last thing that the jury listens to in delivery and she hears casey saying the f-bomb to her mother repeatedly and that emotion shows what casey really is in the jury s mind perhaps. i don t know, but i hope they can balance it and listen to everything, but linda drane-burdick did a fabulous, fabulous job. i would have wished when she did the call said a few more things and ended it there, it would have had more of a high note, and you have to know when to fold them, and that is a tiny
minor thing to say, but bravo to linda. when we left the coverage yesterday the lawyers were going to go in to have a final conference with the judge about what is going to be said, and susan, how important is the charge that the judge is going to say, and how seriously do the jurors listen to this and take it to heart? the charge is extremely, extremely important. it is like getting into the car and thinking that you know how the drive it and then having the instruction manual that tells you all of the things that you don t know, and it is important. the jurors will listen to them. and the judge is going to let them take the instructions into the jury room, and each juror, and they will have the rules of the road and apply it to the car as you drive it and that is how they will deliberate, because they have gotten everything they need from the lawyers at this point. a rehash of the evidence, and gotten their each theories on what the evidence means, but now they need the instructi
we have seen the pictures of her out partying and getting the tattoo, and yet the contradiction that we see shg, jonna, which is that no one said that she didn t love her child. and linda drane-burdick brought that up, where did you get that information from? you got it from people who were her friends and people who have their own lives and good on linda s part where she sort of juxtaposed a lot of that, and if you can t her theme was that casey anthony is the biggest liar that has ever walked the face of the planet, so you can t even believe that she was a good mother, because she was such a huge liar and even her friends, because those are the only people who could vouch for her being a good mother, and she wove that theme throughout the closing argument.