was because of that that it occurred? is that what you are implying? i m not implying it. i m saying you made money off of the death of your husband. i did not make substantial money out of the death of my husband, no. it was the job of the pror to put together a case for a jury to hear. covering up the crime, i think would be our best evidence in terms of trying to convince a jury that her intent at the time of the killing was something along the lines of a premed tatd murder. the prosecution found itself in an unusual predicament. eight years had passed since the shooting and in that time the statute of limit takes had run out on any charge other than first-degree murder. that meant in order to get any conviction at all, prosecutors would have to prove to a jury
those checks were deposited in to my account. totaling how much money. 4 grand a month. it must have helped. it did. the argument could be made that you made money out of this. so are you implying that it was because of that that it occurred? is that what you are implying? i m not implying it. i m saying you made money off of the death of your husband. i did not make substantial money out of the death of my husband, no. it was the job of the pror to put together a case for a jury to hear. covering up the crime, i think would be our best evidence in terms of trying to convince a jury that her intent at the time of the killing was something along the lines of a premed tatd murder. the prosecution found itself in an unusual predicament. eight years had passed since the shooting and in that time the statute of limit takes had run out on any charge other than first-degree murder. that meant in order to get any
murder. the prosecution found itself in an unusual predicament. eight years had passed since the shooting and in that time the statute of limit takes had run out on any charge other than first-degree murder. that meant in order to get any conviction at all, prosecutors would have to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that ellen snyder planned mike snyder s murder and with no crime scene and it will until the way of forensics, that was going to be hard to prove. in her view, it was self defense, but maybe she was guilty of manslaughter, second-degree murder. but you couldn t prosecute her for either of those offenses. that s correct. the statute of limitations here in new mexico on a state case like this prohibited us from going forward on any of those lesser types of offenses. ellen snyder s defense attorney penny adrian knew a first-degree murder conviction could mean a life sentence for
for a year. those checks were deposited in to my account. totaling how much money. 4 grand a month. it must have helped. it did. the argument could be made that you made money out of this. so are you implying that it was because of that that it occurred? is that what you are implying? i m not implying it. i m saying you made money off of the death of your husband. i did not make substantial money out of the death of my husband, no. it was the job of the pror to put together a case for a jury to hear. covering up the crime, i think would be our best evidence in terms of trying to convince a jury that her intent at the time of the killing was something along the lines of a premeditated murder. the prosecution found itself in an unusual predicament. eight years had passed since the shooting and in that time the statute of limit takes had run
totaling how much money. 4 grand a month. it must have helped. it did. the argument could be made that you made money out of this. so are you implying that it was because of that that it occurred? is that what you are implying? i m not implying it. i m saying you made money off of the death of your husband. i did not make substantial money out of the death of my husband, no. it was the job of the pror to put together a case for a jury to hear. covering up the crime, i think would be our best evidence in terms of trying to convince a jury that her intent at the time of the killing was something along the lines of a premed tatd murder. the prosecution found itself in an unusual predicament. eight years had passed since the shooting and in that time the statute of limit takes had run out on any charge other than