is more complicated than we thought. away was before hand thought of as one of the good guys. reporter: the grand jury report credits whirl for standing up to the vatican in some cases of abuse, but also suggests he guided at least one accused priest back into service. cardinal whirl defended himself by saying his dieio cease worked to exceed the conference of bishops and reporting requirements of pennsylvania law, but those are laws that critics say the catholic church is working overtime to influence in its favor. take bishop ronald gainer from harrisburg, he s one of the bishops expressing sorrow for the vigts of his dioceses. he s head the pennsylvania catholic conference, a group that aggressively lobbies against reforming the statute of limit tagtss. the catholic conference has been tenacious in opposing this, and of course they have allies in the pennsylvania legislature.
john brennan asking for answers of his own about targeted killing and why it s justified and how it s justified. the questions themselves are so basic that they are almost more telling than some of the answers they could but probably won t receive. questions like, for example, how much evidence does the president need to determine that a particular american can be lawfully killed? also, this is one that sticks with me, does the president have to provide individual americans with the opportunity to surrender before killing them? sand are there any geographic limit tagtss on the intelligence community s authority to use lethal force against americans. including can intelligence agencies kill people under this authority in the united states. could the cia or any other intelligence agency come kill you if the appropriate high-ranking official in the obama administration, say president obama, decided that you were affiliated with al qaeda, and you were a threat, and you might act eminently