very interesting. and when she said it was because he didn t meet the financial criteria, that clearly wasn t true and i will tell you this, i know people who bank with coutts who have a pittance compared to the £1 million financial criteria and they are still with coote. i have no idea what their political beliefs are. why did she say something, why was she economical with the truth? that something, why was she economical with the truth? with the truth? that is really a ruestion with the truth? that is really a question for with the truth? that is really a question for her with the truth? that is really a question for her rather- with the truth? that is really a question for her rather than i with the truth? that is really a i question for her rather than me. i appreciate that. the whole sequence of events is intriguing first of do you think that there is an issue with tens of thousands of people out there in the country who are in a similar position, who have been de banked? it
like coutts? including a private bank like coutts. so like coutts? including a private bank like coutts. so was - like coutts? including a private bank like coutts. so was it - like coutts? including a private| bank like coutts. so was it right that the ceo bank like coutts. so was it right that the ceo has bank like coutts. so was it right that the ceo has gone? - bank like coutts. so was it right that the ceo has gone? under i bank like coutts. so was it right i that the ceo has gone? under the circumstances, that the ceo has gone? under the circumstances, i that the ceo has gone? under the circumstances, i think that the ceo has gone? under the circumstances, i think that - that the ceo has gone? under the circumstances, i think that is - circumstances, i think that is really how it had to be because there is a second issue as well. there s this fundamental point about banning people because of political opinions, that is important. the second point that is really importan