a mistake. i am a former homicide prosecutor and the first question i asked when i had the questionable evidence when it comes to a legal issue is, do i needit? there is a mountain of evidence that he s already been convicted of one homicide and he is spending life without parole with an eyewitness in the car . he went and was given a deal. why create in appealable issue? it s a close call. it s not a slamdunk. it s not a murder scene tattoo on somebody s chest. it s a gun. the state makes an argument that it s the similarities. i think it s more prejudicial. why does it matter?is already doing life without parole for another kidding. itmatters because he has the right to appeal and he has filed an appeal . what about the two murder victims? we are talking about procedure andevidence. the bottom line , people forget there are two people that died