they are viewed as a political matter as the anti-contraception party. being the pro life parties has never been a disqualifier from being able to elect republicans to the presidency. certainly when it comes to contraception these issues were decided seemingly in the mid 1960s. when you look at the reality in the republican party, just the states democrats won six of the last six elections there are 270 votes needed to win. without exception every single kbrafk group, democrats are are gaining market share. that includes single women, younger voters. this is an enormously problematic political issue for republicans. that s interesting to hear. how do you think it s come to this for republicans? contraception is an issue that i think we all thought we wouldn t talk about in 2014 in politics in america. how did it come to this? did republicans fall into a trap
facing a gender gap. is this talked about inside the party? how do we handle issues or is the party more unified than i hing? look, there are serious religious liberty issues that are part of all of this debate. you know, certainly the republican party for a long time the majority the pro life party. i want to talk about the politics for a second and set aside for a moment the legal arguments which are more complex than i think we have an opportunity to debate now. this is a dangerous place for the republican party to be if they are viewed as a political matter as the anti-contraception party. being the pro life parties has never been a disqualifier from being able to elect republicans to the presidency. certainly when it comes to contraception these issues were decided seemingly in the mid 1960s. when you look at the reality in the republican party, just the