Water works infrastructure improvement, crews will be working on the starting monday, closed between galbraith road and banning road between 7 30 a. M. And 5 p. M. Each business day. The project is expected to take six weeks. Breaking now. For the first caucus of the year. And ted cruz has won in iowa. Cruz finished ahead of donald trump and marco rubio, who were close behind in second and third. Our sara celi is live in studio to break it down. Sara bam r this race was decided early on in the night. Before all the votes were even counted. But as you can see, it was still pretty close, with cruz winning by a few thousand votes. With these three candidates. Cruz, trump and rubio all big winners on the night. A reminder that a caucus is not a winner take all. So you can see the top 3, all came away with a decent amount of delegates. Ted cruz says his victory in iowa was a statement. About who the next president will be. Iowa has sent notice, that the republican nominee and the next presi
The republican president ial hopefuls say their victory in iowa. Will lead to a win in november. Due to a strong showing from its party. But the gop frontrunner. Is no longer in the lead. Vo ted cruz emerged victorious in the iowa caucuses. Meaning hell collect eight delegates to the Republican National convention. He finished with 28 percent of the votes. Donald trump and marco rubio came in second and third, respectively, in the opening contest in the 2016 president ial race. Followed by ben carson and rand paul. Cruz says tonight is a victory for the grassroots. Tonight is a victory for courageous conservatives across iowa and all across this great nation. Tonight the state of iowa has spoken. Iowa, we love you. We thank you. Youre special. Well be back. In fact i might come back and buy a farm. I love it. Marco rubio so this is the moment they said would never happen. For months, they told us we had no chance. Clear winner among the democratic president ial hopefuls. Its a dead hea
President s and congress has followed, that this would lead to a paralysis of our ability to defend ourselves. All of the framers agreed about war and i dont think that is true either like bruce said. I would look at the constitutional text. I have a free copy someone gave me. I expect some place like the committee on the republic we have one. Article 1 says no state shall without the consent of congress engage in war unless actually invaded or in such eminent danger delay isnt allowed. That is the constitutional balance of powers that bruce thinks should apply between the president and congress. All you would have to do is take out the word state and put in the word president. Unless we are invaded or danger of attack. Why couldnt the framers written that if they had intended what bruce said . Instead they wrote provisions that gave some power to congress, some to the president and expected them to fight it out. I want to bring the argument to the contemporary period. I know john was
Years and the same principles apply. Congress is a Political Animal and we are always going to act this way. You can watch this and other programs online at booktv. Org. Author of point of attack and author of constitutional peril they debate the war, Foreign Policy, the use Committee Use of drones and the meaning of the constitution. This is about an hour and a half. Welcome, everyone. Tonight the committee for the republic is hosting a debate on war and the constitution with of our country entering another war in the middle east, tonights debate could not be timelier. The debaters could also be bought better suited to give their points of view. Here below we have john yoo. He was Deputy Assistant attorney general for the office of Legal Counsel in the bush Justice Department. John wrote a number of key than those supporting bushs post9 11 counterterrorism policies. And then bruce was the associate general under president S Ronald Reagan and also the chief policy advisor to rand paul
It is in january 2017. Their is a new president in the oval office. It is the first day on the job. You are there to advise the next president as to how to deal with the rise of an entire american non normative liberal bloc of superpowers. Speaks softly and carry a big stick. Ive wanted to just ask, and given their really awful situation that we have in dealing with this very murky sort of war against terrorists, addressing what would seem to be your tough criticisms of Homeland Security and those operations, it is obvious enough that there are domestic threats that need to be dealt with. What does make sense . Profiling. Profiling. That is how the israelis do it. To be perfectly explicit, but the profiles are and how they are to be pursued. Explicit profiling is subject, as it should be commented democratic debate about what the threats are and how they had to be dealt with. What we have now is so necessarily a kind of bill live via a hidden, arbitrary profiling. And you, because of y