meeting on wednesday. representatives from the romney campaign and about eight editors and reporters from the post and at the end of the meeting, the post said we re not issuing a retraction. we stand by the story. well, the next step in this is one of their columnists, jennifer ruben did again an equally devastating column about a 10-page point by point rebuttal that was presented at the meeting to the washington post by governor romney s people. and i have to tell you, it is a really unbelievable recitation. i don t understand how anybody reading the recitation vs. the actual article itself can in any way say that this reporter had it right. it appears very likely that he had it wrong. now, the next step, the ombudsman, you know, who is the editorial referee steps in at the washington post. his name is patrick pexton and
the paper says it stands by its reporting. liz trotter, an author and journalist and fox news contributor joins us every sunday at this time with the commenta commentary on the media. what s this all about? good morning, eric. now we have the new york times this morning joining the fight that was originally started by the washington post on what exactly and the story that are outlined on the 21st of june, exactly how many jobs were outsourced by romney while he was at bain capital. a private equity firm that invested heavily in companies that would relocate or outsource jobs. the story turns on what your concept is of off shoring vs. outsourcing. there is a difference. this is where it appears the washington post, the writer was tom hamburger felt proper on this. what happened is they had a