warren. it s really pathetic. for all the time, you know, the left, my leftist colleagues spend critiquing donald trump for what they see as mistruth the and mischaracterizing him, i think it s time to expose the mistruths of elizabeth warren. was he prosecuting hate when he prosecuted the hid of the kkk in alabama and advocated for the death penalty? was he advocating hate when he signed ten pleadings against segregation? attorney general cuccinelli could not be more correct. this is libel, and elizabeth warren should be exposed. and i hope she is the democratic nominee, because it will ensure donald trump another four years. it s totally absurd. for one thing, a racist, those are statements of opinion. and in the united states, the first amendment protects the opinion. so there could never be a libel suit based on this. plus that s not true. there is truth as a defense. jeff sessions was denied an
national security advisory and his son who are actually propagating them. i want to ask you about this, he s talking about mike flynn s son. until pizza gate is proven to be false, it will remain false. what do you make of this? michael flynn s son should not have sent out that tweet or given that story any sort of legs or legitimacy. the pizzeria definitely has what i would see as a libel suit on their hands. i appreciate the washington post for once pointing out new answer. michaellder was referring to something completely different from pizza gate. whether he should have gone down that road is an open question. good for the washington post to point out there is a difference that mike flynn the national
michael flynn s son should not have sent out that tweet or given that story any sort of legs or legitimacy. the pizzeria definitely has what i would see as a libel suit on their hands. i appreciate the washington post for once pointing out new nuance. michael flynn the elder was referring to something completely different from pizza gate. whether he should have gone down that road is an open question. good for the washington post to point out there is a difference that mike flynn the national security adviser was not promoting pizza gate. his son should not have done it. he also, general flynn has promoted conspiracy theorys in the past. nypd blows whistle on new hillary e-mails. must read, so he wasn t according to the washington post, and you, it wasn t this particular one, he is still
about a boom rang effect. when you put forth a libel suit, you put yourself on the table to be deposed and have to testify about why it s false. that s very dangerous territory for donald trump. let s talk about the women who are accusing donald trump. for many of them the statute of limitations has expired civilly and criminally. when donald trump stands on the at the podium at the rallies and says some of them want fame, they want money, they want other things, do they have a case here potentially against him? they do when he calls them a liar. remember, this happened in the bill cosby cases when bill cosby called his accusers liars, they had rise to call use defamations against him. the fact you have twitter going crazy and social media on behalf of donald trump who are now vilifying people who are accusing donald trump of the sexual misconduct. that gives more rise and credence to their claims. now they are damages not only by
and jeffrey, trump has now threatened a lawsuit against the new york times, for example, other media outlets who go forward and publish these accusations. is that really serious right now? or is it as a lot of people anticipate, sort of a campaign of intimidation against other women coming forward? you know, wolf, i try to be cautious about legal situations, you know, explaining the possibilities for both sides. the chance of donald trump winning a libel suit against the new york times for its report yesterday is zero. it is absolutely zero. there is no chance he could win. he s a public figure. the times offered him the chance for comment. they were rigorous in their reporting. the libel laws are completely clear that he couldn t possibly win a lawsuit. it is, in part, an attempt to get us to talk about this issue