result of the reaction of donald trump and various republicans to a lawful search going on. so, it is not i think that we should not hold our breath in hope of seeing a lot out of this warrant. the judge also said to the government that he is willing to hear an argument and evidence from them ex parte as to why they want to release or not release things. i think he will be pretty stingy with what he releases. but as i said, they department may have its cake and eat it too because they have very little of the affidavit come out, but they get to respond to all the falsities and the submission on the special master filing. they really get to play in the right forum. if they want to take on that press release that essentially donald trump issued in his filing, they will be able to do it. and just to clarify for the
audience, that little reference to ex parte indicates that the judge is willing to speak to the prosecution alone, without any other lawyers present. the justice department saying, what worries you about this going beyond justice? sorry about that. yes. it is totally obviously, it has to be just with the government otherwise it is all moot if this will happen in open court, than the whole decision is something that is rendered academic. the discussion between the government and the filings are going to happen just between the government and the court. at least in the first instance. if the judge decides that there is some part that should be released, we may see small portions of it. but, again, i don t think it will be too much. especially since the government has another opportunity here to reveal what it wants to reveal. and to take on the issues in that filing. andrew weissmann and bradly moss, thank you once again for
and we re confident that when the true facts come to light in this matter our client ricky martin will be fully vindicated. i appreciate the solidarity and i receive them with my heart. a reputable newspaper in puerto rico says the order quotes the petitioner as saying martin has been been seen loitering near the petitioner s house at least three times. the petitioner feared for his safety. the order was issued after an ex parte request. ex parte is just like a request granted from the other side. but the court hasn t heard the other side. the hearing is august 21st. martin is expected to attend with his attorney although a virtual appearance, the police told me, would be allowed. at the conclusion of the hearing the judge can either extend the order or dismiss it. and there is a big issue out there right now about who this is. because we do not cite the names
In a recent judgment, the president of the District Court of Nicosia held that the refiling of an action, after a previous action on the same issues was withdrawn because the Court had then refused to issue orders on an ex parte basis, constitutes abuse of process. In its judgment, the Court sought to prevent abusive practices by litigants, and took a pragmatic approach with regard to the principles of res judicata, extending the principle to cover parties that were not parties to the first action.
the right to cross-examine witnesses, present laura: you have to pay for your own attorney. those things are due process, but then it says at the appropriate time meaning the state gets to decide when the appropriate time is. if the state then wants to decide all you have to have as an ex parte order in advance of the dash you can sue the government later to get your gun back. that will be the case. here s another example where we are paying the states to do something that congress doesn t dare to do. this is what so evil up a this i think constitutionally it would be difficult to strike is a matter. but as a ploy it has myriad opportunities of being unconstitutional in application. we both know that there are countless instances of constitutional deprivations that are never litigated and that s what i m worried about here. laura: thank you for bonding as you did and thank you