December 10 meeting of 2019. Any additions or corrections . Ill move approval. President caen any Public Comment on the minutes of december 10 . All those in favor . Opposed . Motion carries. Next item, please. Item 4, general Public Comment, members of the public may address the commission on matters that are within the commissions jurisdiction and are not on todays agenda. President caen i have three speaker cards here. The first is dave warner. I dont think i can present this, but can i hand it out. You can put it on the overhead. Im dave warner. Im a palo alto resident. Im also a participant in the mayors water supply stakeholder group. Some of you know ive been speaking at your meetings for three years now, which is a terrific honor. The sfpuc is not sharing draws. Its more important than after as you face major decisions. Should we invest an additional 2 billion or more to develop Water Supplies and raise the rates accordingly to cover the costs . Should we implement rationing as
People. And i think i should have mentioned the drug sobering center. These are other 24 7 facilities which this Response Team could take people to and get them the help they need. Through the chair, i just think its important to talk about how this team is distinct from the h. O. T. Team and the e. M. S. I know it feels like a lot of teams, but we fought to make sure that the language requires coordination amongst all of these teams. They really do have distinct roles. So the h. O. T. Team is not supposed to be experts on Behavioral Health. Their mandate is to outreach and engage with people who are experiencing homelessness. Lets remember, not all people experiencing homelessness have Mental Health or addiction issues. So they are they have another role entirely. Its about well, thats a role that not all of us feel comfortable with now and were always constantly battling out, but it is distinct and separate from the issue of Behavioral Health. The e. M. S. 6 team, the firefighter has
Population compared to other area of the city and also an area where the issue of drug use poses a major problem. Our efforts tell others of other parts of the city such as chinatown and the sunset where permits have been denied or entirely outlawed. The children that i work with regularly find themselves in the presence of open air drug use and going to school or walking in the neighborhoods and many dont feel safe and even in large groups with adult supervision. When new businesses are introduced, they should not be ones that will make a Community Issue already known even worse. Next speaker. I lived and worked in the tenderloin for 12 years and work with a nonprofit in the 300 block of ellis. I dont want to take the time to repeat what everyone said. I want to express my opposition and i dont think we need a cannabis december pencery in the tenderloin dispensary and there is enough on the edges that people with use and urban farm and different ones on the edges of the tenderloin. I
I dont advise you name a particular subcontractor in your motion. You can say that there should be a qualified professional to oversee it. Thank you. That makes sense. Ok. So you want to reword that. Step up, please. Thank you, commissioner hyland. Just to followup on the Square Footage issue, what is in front of you is a certificate of appropriateness, its not locking in the area which were going to the Planning Commission to discuss next month. In your motion it does say 49,364 right now. Our request is currently for 49,999 and thats why we just requested to add the motion. I can accommodate all parties you can amend that language to reach up to 49,499. Thats the way to do it. Thats fine. We have a motion. Second. Could you expand on the qualified professional to review what to oversee the implementation of the architect actual treatments of the facade. Thats accepted by the maker of the motion . Yes. Oh, yeah. Thats fine. I was trying to find where it said the Square Footage. Just g
I dont advise you name a particular subcontractor in your motion. You can say that there should be a qualified professional to oversee it. Thank you. That makes sense. Ok. So you want to reword that. Step up, please. Thank you, commissioner hyland. Just to followup on the Square Footage issue, what is in front of you is a certificate of appropriateness, its not locking in the area which were going to the Planning Commission to discuss next month. In your motion it does say 49,364 right now. Our request is currently for 49,999 and thats why we just requested to add the motion. I can accommodate all parties you can amend that language to reach up to 49,499. Thats the way to do it. Thats fine. We have a motion. Second. Could you expand on the qualified professional to review what to oversee the implementation of the architect actual treatments of the facade. Thats accepted by the maker of the motion . Yes. Oh, yeah. Thats fine. I was trying to find where it said the Square Footage. Just g