So if you were kind of take that a step further and discuss that for us. Thank you. Faq, and mr. Green, for your leadership on this. I think its very important. Yes, there is a range, and i think thats what people have to recognize. Theres a range or develop programs that are needed for common conditions. Outpatient pneumonia. With a lot of drugs out there that still work. They wanted Larger Development programs and thats true for many. But for these very rare, fortunately, resistant organisms that are multidrugresistant, theres almost nothing to treat them. These cases are occurring sporadically here and there, or in outbreaks in icu or Something Like that. And we have to think of different ways of evaluating new treatments. We cant just set up a trial and wait for all this happened and expect we will be able to thousands of people. It is true, in fact, if we enrolled thousands of people it would be too late because this would be a terrible thing. So it is true that all Antimicrobial
Representing more than 51,000 pilots in 31 u. S. And canadian airlines. [inaudible conversations] okay. If we could go ahead and take our seats, well get started. And now i would like to welcome our webcast audience to join us this morning. Thank you for joining in with us. Lets go ahead and begin our next panel. Okay. As i mentioned earlier, im going to change my role, certainly, a little bit x im going to moderate this discussion with our friends from the faa, transport canada and the International Civil Aviation Organization otherwise known as icao. Often its been said that safety is never an end state. Those of us in the safety business know it is ever changing, and our work is never finished. We can never delude ourselves into thinking weve got all the answers, and i know most of you know that. No flight is ever routine or just like the previous one. To some degree, theres always a unique set of conditions and circumstances that present a challenge to an otherwise safe and unevent
And markets are always looking for longterm signals. We just gave a very bill longterm signals that i believe in what i am hearing is opening the door to investments in the United States and that is a very good thing but people should also keep in mind and be converted by the fact that our climate decisions have been referred three times by the supreme court. There is no where else did go. They said move forward and that is what we are doing and so i think it is the strong a signal as we can possibly have, that the u. S. Is open to looking at how to devise a low carb and economy and get it moving and running in a way that will entice investment. That is good for everybody. Madam administrator, let me tell you we deeply appreciate your taking time with us and the work you are doing and if i get it right i would like to borrow an expression from your book, you did wicked good. Thank you. [applause] that is all right. The media at a going to have a little press availability right here. [i
About tragedy and redemption. I would say you could call it the canary in a coal mine case of how we live with our technology both in constructive and constructive ways. I think we have a lot to talk about. And i wanted to welcome you. Guest where was that when i needed an elevator pitch . That was great. Host i wanted to welcome you at also start off by asking, the word deadly is in the title. How deadly . Before we go into the story, how deadly is this trend . I we talk about historically, especially visavis to driving which everyone has heard about. Guest first of all, i like your canary in a coal mine reference. The reason i like it a relative to the question you just asked is the canary is that the if you are texting while youre driving, it will kill you, but its really indicative of a lot of other things when it comes to distraction, sitting at the dinner table, you know, being counterproductive at work. So thats kind of the extreme example. Out how deadly, specific your question
The Intelligence Community to try to increase the amount of transparency about what that community does but thats running against the culture of that community and its a challenge because there are legitimate security reasons you dont blab about what you do but i do think that the lessons the last two years are that to the extent to a much greater extent than in the past the Intelligence Community would benefit from Greater Transparency about what its doing and why. Which is easy to say and hard to do. Do any of our panelists have any comments on the usa freedom act pending in congress and the differences between the house and the Senate Version of the bill, one of our questions related to the provision thats not in the house bill but in the senate bill regarding the special advocate for to be present before the fisa court. There was a provision in the house bill thats somewhat different than the senate bill. So i mean the house bill also had its not exactly special advocate. What it i