or how they might orient themselves differently that would satisfy american demand. from the us perspective, they want to make sure that the chinese understand us concerns, understand where the parameters and policy are and i think the big challenges that everyone else, where are those parameters? where is the art and where does defence start and where does defence start and is that where it will ultimately land, or will this yard to keep expanding and defence keep growing taller? sadly, for the rest of us in asia, that is a very important question. figs asia, that is a very important question- asia, that is a very important cuestion. a ., , , question. as you mention, she s fourth highest question. as you mention, she s fourth highest level question. as you mention, she s fourth highest level official - fourth highest level official to visit china from the united states but i want to ask you why is the secretary of commerce, not a trade representative in the us, visiting china?
know that orders have been put in place. know that orders have been put in lace. ., ., ., in place. there are more than 1000 fires in place. there are more than 1000 fires burning in place. there are more than 1000 fires burning across - 1000 fires burning across canada right now. in general, does the wildfire service have enough resources to deal with so many places taking place all at the same time? that is probably a provincial level question. i am focused on these particular fires in level question. i am focused on these particularfires in this area. we bring in teams a number of prudent through the province. we ve got a team from ontario working with us and 0ntario working with us and then a good chunk of the resources that are working on these wildfires here are structured detection personnel from a variety of different fire departments from communities throughout the province. communities throughout the rovince. , , ., province. just in general in terms of province. just i
was an answer that changes it changes everything. it kind of makes me emotional. i see that. jonathan lemire just gave one to us. welcome back to morning joe. jonathan, you go. you re up. five seconds. not five seconds. the question was like chris matthews level question. you answered it. the distinguished gentleman from brooklyn. we built the suspense there, joe. that was really good television. yeah, so basically, this is what the white house says. the only person in washington who thinks the build back better bill is happening this year is schumer. others understand it is january, and it could be beyond that. voting right it is the priority. aides understand they re progressive groups to do that. we had the deputy secretary on at 5:00 a.m., and i pushed her
only the president in the end can really determine the acceptable level of risk we must take. so you along with other democrats who believe that, listen, there should be more at a faster time line, but mike mullen and other military leaders conceding they would have liked to have seen a far different story here which we knew going into this. yes, we did. we will have a lot of of different opinions, but every united states senator has to make up their own mind and just on the troop level question, but the overall policy. we have to drawdown substantially, and we have to transition and one of the reasons is because we have made a lot of progress. there is some good news here as well in terms of the progress that we have made in terms of the security and in terms of where are the policy s and the second reason we need to move to a new phase, a new chapter here is because we cannot spend $120 billion on this policy. we cannot support it with the deficit and debt challenges that we have