democratic congressman of maryland, asm member of both th house judiciary and oversight committees. first, let s start with the scope question in light all of the evidence. lev parnas has said he wants to cooperate. he s turned ovvarious evidence. there s pages of documents inside the white house about the review. what is your thought on the balance between speed in all of this and getting everything you can possibly get? well, first, thanks for having me. and we re obviously interested in all relevant testimony from all material witnesses and chairman schiff has said that the job is not necessarily over as more evidence comes in. i think oversight committee feels the same way and the judiciary committee.mm on the other hand we re in the
personal political benefit, not our national security. devin nunes seems to be involved in it and has not disclosed that. i mean, i think that i would have to disagree with rudy giuliani about it not mattering. no, it would matter a great deal. and lev parnas has, as we know, been indicted for federal charges last month. here s to the skeptic part of me. he comes forward with some new information, perhaps to get leniency here. could that impact his credibility as a witness? reporter: well, look, le lev parnas is obviously an imperfect witness. he has a history of wrongdoing, but i think that our reporting is showing more and more that he was far more central to this shadow foreign policy than any of us yet know. his lawyer now has a hashtag on