of the windrush generation were repatriated in the 1950s, 60s and 70s. our findings show more than 400 chronically sick and mentally ill patients were sent back to the caribbean. and evidence suggests it wasn t always for their benefit. government documents from the 1960s show that people like june and marcia s parents should only have been repatriated if they wanted to return, if their doctor felt it would benefit their health, and if there were resources there to look after them. but this letterfrom the jamaican high commission says hospital authorities were trying to send patients back largely due to pressure on beds, giving the impression that this was being done regardless of whether adequate treatment was available. lawyerjacqueline mckenzie has represented hundreds of victims of the windrush scandal. she and other legal experts we ve spoken to questioned the legality of the practice. i think this is worse than
england team to try and to fail is no failure at all. at least it s easy to say that right now. to football now. after lionel messi s move to the mls the future of another one of paris saint germain s star forwards is now unclear on what s been a topsy turvy day of transfer turbulence surrounding kylian mbappe. initially it looked as though he would be leaving psg after telling the club he wouldn t be extending his contract beyond 202a. however, it later emerged that mbappe did want to stay for now, but according to a letterfrom his camp, next season would be his last at the club. now to los angeles where golf is preparing for its next major of the season the us open. but the tournament has been overshadowed by news off the course, of the planned merger between saudi arabia s public investment fund and the pga and dp world tours. the announcement hasn t been well received by many of the players who remained
our goal of making this the best country in the world for tech. let me just conclude with this final thought. i was recently looking for a collection held by the british library, and i saw a letterfrom charles babbage to the then chancellor dating from the 18305, thanking him forfunding his difference engine, the forerunner of the modern computer. that was a decisive moment. the british deci5ive moment. the british government broke with the conventions of the time and for a decade back to this breakthrough technology. we are at a similar moment today, and i m determined that when future researchers visit the british library in 200 years time, they will discover that this government and all of us here in this room met this moment with the same courage, vision and determination. thank you.
consider the prison intelligence material and so that they could address the possibility of a discretionary life sentence to meet the concerns of the risks going forward. i have a letterfrom your mother dated the 13th of april this year. she sets out her support for you and her assessment of your progress. she also makes clear that your father and your sisters will support you whilst in custody and on your release. she sets out her assessment that your views have changed in your period in custody through your engagement with an ideological mentor and since taking time to think and reflect. she also sets out the regret you have expressed to her for your actions. the supplementary note for sentence submitted on your behalf sets out extracts from a number of the decisions of the court of appeal on the approach to discretionary life sentences, as well as addressing issues around age and maturity.
be kept private. the like personal whatsapps they should be kept private- like personal whatsapps they should be kept private. the government has coo erated be kept private. the government has c00perated fully be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with the be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with the inquiry - cooperated fully with the inquiry today, handing over tens of thousands of documents and we will continue to comply of course with the law, cooperate with the inquiry. we are confident in our opposition by carefully considering next steps. there was a 4pm deadline for the government to decide what to do, then a letterfrom government to decide what to do, then a letter from the cabinet office sticking to its position. it is not handing over an redacted material. in fact, they are taking the matter to court. it said. it went on to say. so what is the crux of their argument? so what is