investigations this four-page letter, this summary was immediately met with wide criticism that it didn t really accurately reflect what mueller was saying. that s not true what it was, it was a tantrum by the people who were hoping that mueller would be able to bring down trump. wait a minute mueller himself wrote you a letter complaining, he said the summary didn t capture the substance of his report and that there was now public confusion. no, he didn t say the substance of his report actually he did mueller s letter said barr s summary did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office s work and conclusions. in his book, barr frequently defends trump, but there were flash points, like the so-called perfect phone call with ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy, now a war time leader. trump called on zelenskyy to investigate joe biden. his whole maneuver of trying to get the ukrainians to investigate biden,
Prior to the Epic Case Decision, Apple wins in Blix Case, another member of the Coalition for App Fairness fighting Apple in the U S +
patentlyapple.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from patentlyapple.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
his report today. he chose to make the very specific remarks about why he didn t make a determination. i think that is pretty clearly the to correct the public record in the same way he thought the initial letter that bill barr sent to congress left a misimpression with the american public. he wrote a letter complaining. i think he today wanted to set the record straight because bill barr s president conference and testimony to congress and interviews with fox news had left a misimpression with the american public. anyone that read the mueller report would have known that what bill bar said in the clips you just shows was misleading. a lot of people haven t read the report. very misleading. and this is not that thing where i m just asking questions. i m really genuinely trying to understand this, matt. i m going to play for you some of the thing mr. barr said even if technically are arguably defensible, they left the people and public and plenty of experts with the impression that ba
the right call when an agent s work was called into question because he had demonstrated a perceived bias. and that agent was immediately removed from the investigation. now, compare that, don, to president trump. he learned that his national security advisor michael flynn had lied to the fbi and he kept him on as long as he possibly could until it was made public by the washington post. for over 18 days he stayed on, and finally when it became a public relations problem, he was fired. this team, bob mueller and the professionals around him, they heard about a perceived bias and the agent was removed. that s what you do when you have an issue with someone on your team. not what you do is what donald trump did with michael flynn. i ll take the mueller team any day than what we ve seen out of the white house. the congress wrote a letter complaining about e-mails. the mueller team is pushing back