to force issues that have nothing to do with the budget and have nothing to do with the debt. elisabeth: it s all over defunding obamacare. are republicans just doing what they were elected to do or should they just give up and let the law fail on its own? steve: let s talk to fox news legal analyst, peter johnson, jr. what do you think? i think that we got a severe problem in this country at this point. a failure of leadership when the president has not spoken to mr. boehner in weeks, since the syria conflict. and so when we engage in the kind of language that harry reid has used, calling republican leaders anarchists, when the president accuses republican leaders of committing crimes, the crime of extortion, we re at a perilous point in our politics. the challenge is, will republicans act in the same fashion with that kind of bloated, high flown, out of control rhetoric that does harm to our country? we need a time when the president and the speaker and the leader of the senate
expected to unveil its newest batch of iphones. the iphone 5s and 5c. the new phones rumored to have a better camera and battery and possibly a finger print scanner for security. that is about it. no bigger screens. where s steve jobs? steve doocy, we have you. steve: that s right. one of the phones is supposed to be much, much cheaper. a fox news alert. president obama getting ready to deliver a prime time speech on syria at 9 p.m. eastern time but now congress seems split on authorizing military force. what happens if both chambers can t agree on green lighting a military strike? let s talk to fox news contributor judge napolitano. we re going to talk about how john kerry undid a bunch of stuff yesterday but first white house aides said the possibility of a strike against syria still not off the table? even the president indicated it yesterday, that it s still not off the
let s move our attention to washington and reaction over of the thousands of rules violations in watching phone numbers on calls around the country about the nsa the intelligence agency meant to rotech you has protect you, has lawmakers questioning constitutionality of these programs. they believe, critics that they re gathering too much information on the american people. others on capitol hill say no, this is for your safety. watch. it is not a problem of the fact it is it worked. if you have 99.9% compliance and self-reporting errors these came from internal report which becomes part of an overall ig report. i m on the intelligence committee. i am satisfied. martha: peter king is satisfied. let s talk to fox news chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge live in washington. catherine, really this is a bipartisan issue. there is across the board opposition to these programs
the airline industry says it could be the future of flying. not for me, i don t think. how about you, steve? steve: we ll see. meanwhile, the irs said sorry for targeting conservatives. but can anyone be prosecuted? john boehner hopes so. the irs has admitted to targeting conservatives. even if the white house continues to be stuck on the word if. now, my question isn t about who is going to resign. my question is who is going to jail over this scandal? steve: wow. that s a good question. can somebody go to jail? let s talk to fox news legal analyst, peter johnson, jr. who is zooming who? it looks like we re getting zoomed, the american people right now. unless there is a special prosecutor or special counsel appointed, the likelihood is this thing will be forced under the rug big time. but i took a hard look at the laws last night and there are about three or four different
and to the world that we were going to take whatever steps were necessary to protect the american people from harm, particularly from a terrorist attack. at the same time, the president made clear from the outset of his administration that we were at all times going to act in a manner that was both lawful and consistent with our values. ok, but is it lawful? let s talk to fox news senior judicial analyst judge anld rube napolitano. judge, you say no. he s breaking the law. he s absolutely breaking the law. this killing business is extremely dangerous stuff. the president can only kill in accordance with the constitution on federal law. so what does the constitution say? he can only kill using the military. if the united states has been attacked and he s repelling the attackers. if the united states is about to be attacked, the attack is certain and it would be foolish to wait for them to shoot first or pursuant to a declaration of war, he can only kill using civilian employees of t