you that why would they want to divert the narrative? because there was a white house approved version of what reality is. there was this it s nothing to do with religion. don t use the word juwaad. it s about unemployed people. remember the famous phrase all you need are jobs for jihadis. so there was this white house narrative. and the media just facilitated it. steve: let s talk for a moment at what s at stake. later today there is going to be a conference call. the circuit of appeals out in california and western states are going to rule on the trump administration travel ban. if they throw it out, i know you would say that s good. but if they say it s going to stay and goes to the supreme court, what s the matter with that? well, it just means that there is more misinterpretation of what is a very, very clear executive order. the rights of the president as laid down in the 1952 law and more recent law are very explicit. if there is a national security threat to america.
the president involved in each thousand job. remember, you know, you might create something like a couple million jobs a year. if the president has to negotiate each, you know, thousand bucket of jobs, then he s going to be very busy. there are big issues about the corporate taxes that are out there. there are big issues about how capital gains are treated, that thing the trump administration wants to address, as well as offering perhaps some more business-friendly environment. so these are things that are going to be more a broader policy. we don t know what was offered, but if donald trump is going to run this as a kind of retail economic policy, it will be very interesting to cover. and, you know, interesting, if you look at the data points, donald trump is inheriting a economy that is in such better shape than what barack obama inherited, the wreckage that he inherited in 08 and 09, so it s a really interesting contrast. there were certain advantages on the ground, fundamentals
that, and it would be surrounded by a halo of black suit, and maybe on the skin, a grain or two of powder. but you wouldn t see powder tatt tattooing. because what the clothing would do, it disperses the soot. it doesn t disperse the powder. the powder would be inside the bod body. from a medical examiner s standpoint, with your training and experience, literally having written the book, is this a hard call for you? no. this is basic, you know, 101. let s talk for a moment, if we might, about the trajectory of the bullet itself. and having reviewed the medical examiner s report, included the
outstretched position to underneath his body objection. leading question. sustained. could that include moving his arms from an outreached position to underneath his body during that 10 to 15 seconds? yes. at the time that one loses consciousness, i take it they then lose the ability for voluntary movement? oh, yeah. once you re unconscious, you don t have voluntary movement. you would not be feeling pain. that s correct. let s talk for a moment about
you see differently than what you see here? you would see a hole like that and it would be surrounded by a halo of black soot, and maybe on the skin, a grain or two of powder. but you wouldn t see powder tattooing because what the clothe do, is tsgurs the soot. the powder would be inside the body. from a medical examiner s standpoint with your training and experience, literally having written the book, is this a hard call for you? no. this is this is basically, you know, 101. let s talk for a moment, if we might, about the trajectory