think, is unassailable. what he s really saying is barr is talking out of both sides of his mouth. on the surface he s just saying, well, we need to figure it out and i m just i haven t been fully satisfied. but there is just no doubt that he s carefully chosen words and rhetoric that echo the talking points of team trump and the president himself and is essentially employing dog whistle terminology to keep this whole notion alive, even as he suggests, well, i haven t decided anything yet. comey s point is well taken. if you have proof of this, fine, come forward. but until you do, the sort of insinuations, especially as they continue to sort of trash really good professionally respected members of the fbi are just just deplorable. and, harry, let s speak english here.
continue to sort of trash really good professionally respected members of the fbi are just just deplorable. and, harry, let s speak english here. a lot of institutionalists are still slack jawed that this guy was willing to come out and say outloud no collusion prior to us ever having seen a word of the mueller report, and he said it five or six times. yeah. so, i mean, that s the whole that s where the whole kind of barr bandwagon on which i was a member went totally off the tracks. and that s where everything has been seen through since. when we came out there and basically took a report that was very damning on collusion and conclusively damning on obstruction, it became clear
fired flynn and trump wasn t really trusting democrats at the time. so they re defending him saying what michael was saying, that that tweet didn t represent the whole picture. he didn t have a full comprehensive briefing on him. and in terms of the mueller report, barr s letter succeeded in what they tried to do. it let them set a narrative of no obstruction, no collusion that at least mr. trump s supporters are buying and he ll need more than just them to win re-election. but they got out of the gate with the first message about the mueller report, which is a big head start. harry, let s talk english again. the house judiciary committee leads the league in fried chicken eating and angry letter writing thus far. do you think democrats for their part are taking an undue amount of time to exert the rights and privileges they have on this case?
been successful. in terms of defending trump s suit, they had surrogates out there explaining that president obama warned him-ish, they re saying. they re saying he warned against flynn in the oval office, but he fired flynn and trump wasn t really trusting democrats at the time. so they re defending him saying what michael was saying, that that tweet didn t represent the whole picture. and in terms of the mueller report, ba rrkbarr s letter suc in what they tried to do. no obstruction, no collusion that at least mr. trump s supporters are buying and he ll need more than just them to win re-election. but they got out of the gate with the first message about the mueller report, which is a big head start. harry, let s talk english again. the house judiciary committee