.to a new world.s. deeper than the ocean. as unfathomable as the universe. a world that doesn t exist outside you. .but within you. where breakthrough science is replacing chemotherapy with immunotherapy. where we can now attack the causes of disease, not just the symptoms. where medicines once produced for all, are now designed to fit you. today 140,000 biopharmaceutical researchers go bodly to discover treatments and cures unimaginable ten years ago. .and are on the verge of more tomorrow.
theory networks, political analysts, actually made this comment about the president. it s a sad day when you cannot depend on the president. it s just like hugging a suicide bomber. he ll blow you up in the process with him. also tonight, another new disturbing example. heidi clue. let s hope he doesn t because i won t perform if he does. because i hate him. hannity: is a photo that sold graphic, we have to warn you because it sold graphic. kathy griffin making the isis
time since we learned jared kushner withheld and did not disclose his contact with russian officials during the transition. it will be interesting to see the senators probe him on that subject. i don t know how much he will be willing to give up on that. i m actually interested less in what comey has to say than in what donald trump s response to comey is. a president who has shown very little ability to restrain himself when it comes to responding to comey. comey seems to push certain buttons with trump like few others do. i don t know he will be able to help himself from tweeting. i know his lawyers told him not to. his aides have pleaded with him to stop. we know it doesn t work. i know. the reaction that trump has to comey will be just as interesting as whatever comey says. let s hope he doesn t tweet out covfefe during the comey testimony. let s talk about the trump response, molly.
that s not something you ve seen trump that s not rhetoric you ve seen trump use before. very interesting shift but not yet it s early days but not contexturalized. it s major pivot. no one saw it coming. what does it mean in terms of u.s. policy when it comes to syria. if let s say assad does the same thing again, let s hope he doesn t, but if he does what toes the u.s. do? do they intervene again and will the u.s. stop as well make an air strike if there are other bombs. where do you draw the line? there s a scenario where this doesn t fundamentally change anything. if assad looks at this okay we won t use chemical weapons any more we ll proceed with the usual means of repression that we ve used the air strikes and barrel bombs the u.s. has largely ignored that for five or six years now and could continue, conceivably doing that and the situation in syria would
on the highest court in the land. trigger the nuclear option. let s hope he doesn t. martha: there you are. experts are ringing the alarm bells promising that this kind of rancor could kill the senate known as the great deliberative body forever, potentially, right? joining me more on this a republican strategist and richard fowler fox news contributor and senior fellow at the new leaders council. worth taking that big picture view of this, gentleman. because these are the guys that are supposed to be, and women, supposed to be the sort of the states men of the united states government, right? they re the deliberate operators. they are the people who sort of think things through and some to some sort of wise conclusion. at this point, if they enact this flynn anthis filibuster ane nuclear reaction everybody might as well go home there won t be anything to deliberate. there is some truth to