as normally. he said we ll have to wait to see. my translation was i have to count the votes to see if i can block somebody, as well. i understand a piece of justice breyer s reticence he doesn t want to look and more importantly he doesn t want to make the court look like another political player. let s get serious, if e were if he were to refrain retiring at the end of the month or in early july, and were to retire next year, how political would things look if a process launched with republicans trying to block after the midterm if, i mean, after the midterm elections. it could be just a mess. a mess for the court and a mess for the country. right. it could be a mess. i just think it s going to be a mess no matter what happens because of the characters involved. in the minute we have left, i want to talk about potential
grapple with its second wave? and what about people who are watching right now who said, well, what about the moderna shot, i got that shot, will that help me against the india variant? well, pamela, shucks, i m vaccinated already, i can t get in that lottery for the hamilton tickets. right, i know. i would have thrown out there to get the shot if i knew that. exactly. but let s get serious. i think it s wonderful news that the vaccine actually is providing protection that is documented against this variant in india. because variants can be imported into the united states and they might spread here. so, so far our vaccines are doing a gad job in protecting against almost all of the variants, even partial protection against that south african variant, but there s not much of that in this country. so more people, loelt s get vaccinated. the vaccines are working.
Transcripts for FOXNEWS Tucker Carlson Tonight 20201217 05:21:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
because of what he did in his first five months. and if we had not been talking about impeachment in 2017, the president would have been far more blatant in 2019. he would have just tweeted to the ukrainians and everyone else, you better give me, you better give me dirt on biden. ed: now you re just opposing that, doesn t that make their president s point, you are throwing spaghetti at anything you hope steaks? no, i am simply making the point that if none of us had talked about impeachment in 2017, this president would have been bolder in 2019. i m glad that we made him aware of impeachment back then. ed: let s get serious about the votes ahead in the house, you would expect that the democrats, your party is going to have the votes to move it forward. that seems likely. there would be a senate trial, just an hour or so ago democratic leader chuck schumer wants a whole slate of witnesses. and if he does not get some of these top trump administration
apologize after we were proven right on amazon and saved the public billions. stuart, you know, there s only going to be 1500 jobs coming to new york city as opposed to the 25,000. are you going to apologize to her? [laughter] no. pete: is have you ever apologized? i m over 70 [laughter] in my life i ve made some apologies. pete: yeah, we all have. lisa: but alexandria ocasio-cortez okay, let s get serious here. 1500 amazon positions are coming to new york city. we don t know which positions they are, what they re going to pay, but we do know they are not the 25,000 positions, highly paid positions that were going to come to new york city before aoc blocked it. so, no, no apologies required for aoc. but, you know, she did get one thing right. amazon is moving these 1500 people to new york city without any subsidies being offered by the city which we know of. there would have been some subsidy cans offered for the