off the a ballot and making quite clear the answer will be now no. but the high court about to face another constitutional showdown on presidential immunity. we have the house attempting to impeach a cabinet officer, the homeland security chief, for the first time in 150 years and falling shocking hi short. we have the implosion of a bipartisan is border bill, and this will give you a sense of the media a debate. at this point jesse watters prime time is not sure house republicans are capable of anything. why are republicans writing border bills with democrats to keep the border open, dodging fox and selling it on cnn? because senators hoped nobody would read the bill. it failing is the fault of republicans. i mean, that s just obvious to anybody covering it. and it is the most conservative immigration bill or border bill that i ve seen in this town in 25 years of covering this issue. howard: we also have republicans calling for the heads of their top leaders in the house
arguments used by donald trump to fend off the cases popping up cross the country challenging his place in the 2024 ballot. it is an existential threat to the one thing that donald trump sees as the way out of all his legal problems, winning the presidency. a brand-new brief to the supreme court alongside other prominent lawyers like george conway, michael luttig calls for the justices to take the 14th amendment very literally. they say, quote, because section 3 emerged from the hallowed ground of the civil war, this court must accord section 3 its fair meaning, not a narrow construction. mr. trump incited and therefore engaged in an armed insurrection against the constitution s express and foundational mandates that require the peaceful transfer of executive power to a newly elected president. in doing so mr. trump disqualified himself under section 3. regarding trump s argument the so-called insurrectionist ban can only be applied after a candidate is elected, luttig and
our task force teams found seven deceased individuals on scene. we transported nine individuals to the hospital to area trauma facilities. of those that we transported, two have since died, three are in critical surgery and four are stable. reporter: so this all started just after 3:30 yesterday, a male shooter opening fire at the allen premium outlet about 30 minutes north of dallas. dozens of shots were reported as employees and shoppers scrambled if for safer areas, soming even getting a terrifying glimpse of the gunman. my mom and i were in johnson and murphy s shopping, is and out of nowhere heard about, like, 10 pops go off. i look at the customer next to me, i was, like, was that gunshots? no, probably just construction, and then we heard, like, 10, 15 more shots go off. and so i ran to the front of the store and we re like, no, that s shooting. there s this guy dressed in all black wearing a vest, has an assault rifle, and he s just shooting at people. reporte
he s 18. he s in city hall in beaverton, oregon. and according to him, he s high on mushrooms. so he starts a fight with some cops. they all wrestle, and then jared grabs a cop s gun and shoots it. more cops jump in. it ends up taking seven cops two full minutes to restrain jared, and he makes it out alive. this is white privilege. if that idea bothers you, then let s just call it benefit of the doubt. those cops give jared the benefit of the doubt that his life matters, that his life is worth saving, even when he takes one of their guns and shoots it. now, of course, when you re black, we rarely get that benefit of the doubt. cops murdered laquan mcdonald in less than 30 seconds. cops killed tamir rice in less than two seconds. but jared, he got probation and a fine and just a bump on the forehead. on this episode, we re talking about the difference between two minutes and a few seconds. you want to call the police on him for having a barbecue on a sunday at the lake
and welcome to tucker carlson. tonight, for thousands of yearsi ,clinicanel trials have beene be the center of medicine. and the idea is very simple. you before you operate on someow or inject people with some trias first. to make certain that w new drug, you run trials first to make certain that what you re doing will helpis is no the patient more than it hurts the patient. this is not a new idea. james lynn did it back inh the 18th century with his famous scurvy trials . in fact, medical testing hast bc been going on since at least biblical times. is why wouldbecause why wouldn , daniel, if judah compared toal l vegetarian diet with the diet td of the royal babylonians over a ten day period, we had a control group, independent observers, the whole thing. it s not complicated, but it is essential through history.oni very few have questioned this practice because it makes obviouit m sense, s sense. but now they are moderndern m medicine seemsed to be abandonig the clinica