that s a great spin. one at a time here. paul, let me that s a great spin. well, i would like to respond to it. let paul go ahead and then i ll let you respond. part of the constitution cannot be unconstitutional. illogic. that s fine. second if, it only applies to african-americans, which is clearly wrong. the senator is wrong about his history and constitution scholarship, then he wants to change it. senator lindsey graham of south carolina has become a big talking point among some in the republican party. the notion that we re going to attack one of our fundamental freedoms and why? why? well, actually, illegal immigration is down. deportations are up. enforcement is up. this democratic president has been far tougher on the immigration policy than his predecessor ever was. there s something about the democrat being in the white house and he wants to change it. enough of the misinformation. simply not true.
in 1942 why do you want to abuse it? it was never intended. hang on. it s wrong. it s unconstitutional. i mean wait, wait. you ask me why i want to change it. let me tell you why. the 14th amendment can t be unconstitutional, senator. it is the constitution. whoa, whoa, whoa. that s a great spin. one at a time here. paul, let me that s a great spin. well, i would like to respond to it. let paul go ahead and then i ll let you respond. part of the constitution cannot be unconstitutional. il logic. that s fine. second if, it only applies to african-americans, which is clearly wrong. the senator is wrong about his history and constitution scholarship, then he wants to change it. senator lindsey graham of south carolina has become a big talking point among some in the republican party. the notion that we re going to attack one of our fundamental freedoms and why? why? well, actually, illegal immigration is down. deportations are up. enforcement is up. this democrat
in 1942 why do you want to abuse it? it was never intended. hang on. it s wrong. it s unconstitutional. i mean wait, wait. you ask me why i want to change it. let me tell you why. the 14th amendment is the constitution. the 14th amendment can t be unconstitutional, senator. it is the constitution. whoa, whoa, whoa. that s a great spin. one at a time here. paul, let me that s a great spin. well, i would like to respond to it. let paul go ahead and then i ll let you respond. part of the constitution cannot be unconstitutional. illogic. that s fine. second, if it only applies to african-americans, which is clearly wrong. the senator is wrong about his history and constitution scholarship, then he wants to change it. senator lindsey graham of south carolina has become a big talking point among some in the republican party. the notion that we re going to attack one of our fundamental freedoms and why? why? well, actually, illegal
for so i have some bias there. neither party has a monopoly on virtue. i have to say, i m very impressed by paul, because a lot of democrats who are in tough competitive districts would love to see both congress members rangel and waters resign very, very quickly, and a lot of folks on the right are very eager to see senator ensign resign as well. because it does complicate the story. although you have bill crystal telling republicans, just be quiet on the charlie rangel thing, let it play out. yeah. you could argue, there s no need to get in the way of this thing, they re destroying themselves pretty well as it is. that makes sense. here s the thing, in every case for example, during the 2006 cycle when there s a lot of talk about jack abramoff, there were scandals, but does it fit the bigger story?
and then you have the case in 1942 why do you want to change the why do you want to abuse it? it was never intended wait a minute, if it s wrong, it s unconstitutional. you ask me why i want to change it, let me tell you why. the 14th amendment is the constitution, the 14th amendment can t be unconstitutional, it is the constitution. if in fact it that s a great spin. one at a time. let me paul, let paul go ahead and then i ll let you respond. paul? okay. part of the constitution cannot be unconstitutional. well, illogic. that s fine. second, if it only applies to african-americans, which is clearly wrong. and the senator is wrong on his reference. you don t need to change it. he wants it, and some others, senator kyl, senator from arizona has picked this up, senator lindsey graham of south carolina has become a big talking point among some in the republican party. the notion that we re going to