both of you here. there is a lost unknown of what you re saying. to be clear let s let mueller find out. there was a lot of malignant social media going on, but we don t have any proofer that any votes were different as a result of what happened. so we ll see what they put together in that report. i don t think you re going to see anything that can prove that. it is a very subjective consideration. but while we re on the point of the d.o.j. and mueller, let me ask you something about whitaker real quick, rick. if you had a choice whether or not to make this man the person that you want to put out there and protect in such a valued position, is this the guy you d pick? well, first, i know him. i don t know him well. i ve met him. i ve had a lot of respect for him. he s run for office in iowa. he served as u.s. attorney. he did so very commendably from everything that i know about him. and he s a very he s a good solid man. i saw that quote that you were playing that somehow so
elected. well, let s find out. you want to talk about fraud, talk about russia s influence on the election. you mentioned .0003. you add about 20 more zeroes. that s how much impact russia s, quote, involvement i didn t say that. you don t have any data about that. we do because we know how much social media was out there and beknow how much of a, quote, russian influence was in that and it wasn t even a drop in the bucket. it was like water vapor. hold on, there is room on both of you here. there is a lost unknown of what you re saying. to be clear let s let mueller find out. there was a lot of malignant social media going on, but we don t have any proofer that any votes were different as a result of what happened. so we ll see what they put together in that report. i don t think you re going to see anything that can prove that. it is a very subjective consideration. but while we re on the point of the d.o.j. and mueller, let me ask you something about whitaker real qu