that you look for the facts or the truth or the chain of evidence. and in a sense, he s not delegitimizing himself but he s always changing. you can t catch him. so that there s a kind of deniability built into everything. let me go to david. i mean, lying about something that may not be illegal, i mean, i m not sure anybody says it is, doing business while you re running for president. it smells bad because it s a clear conflict. why are you saying you re going to defend the interests of the united states when they go into conflict with russia if you re trying to make money on russia, offering them condo deals on the side? i mean t does look like double dealing, in fact, it is double dealing. but that s not necessarily illegal. the question is, do you trust him on anything? when he denies the business how about denying the collaboration on the politics end where his family s involved with both pieces of it? well, the denials about russia are no longer at all credible. even donal
the only difference was president trump. they had a leader who has a spine and who has the same kind of commitment and understanding as someone not from politics, about what will the future be? what i would legacy has got to be that and as a woman in this country, as someone who has gone through a lot of things, like a lot of american women have, we are not going to let this failed, because we turned away at the wrong time. this is our time. the 80s were important and so the 90s, but this is our time to secure. sean: that s not good. let me go to david. i think all americans recognize what was happening in those decades. sean: david, between that and what we have seen, hillary s rhetoric, eric holder s rhetoric, tim kaine s rhetoric and then you see all these women and even ted cruz and his wife create a crowd, follow them, get on their face, tell them they are not wanted anywhere anymore. wow. we are still americans i though
could not be a basis for criminal charges, but it would be a basis for constitutional violations. sean: if we applied the standard, you agree it s applicable. there s no ambiguity here. not behaving like a current cia employee. let me give you a hypothetical. it s a quick hypothetical. let s assume there was somebody who wasn t behaving like a cia director but was saying things positive about the president. and the president didn t revoke his security clearance, then we d have a serious question. it s the content of the information. sean: this is such an egregious abuse. you recognize anyone with common sense realizes no cia employee can t act this way.it former director. let me go to david. i want to stay on this firewall issue, firewalls plural. i cannot imagine why a christopher steele is in contact. 70 plus times, at least that we know of, with bruce ohr. the things that they are talking about, the urgency he s
it could not be a basis for criminal charges, but it would be a basis for constitutional violations. sean: if we applied the standard, you agree it s applicable. no ambiguity here. not behaving like a current cia employee. let me give you a hypothetical. let me give you one quick hypothetical. let s assume there was somebody who wasn t behaving like a cia director but was saying things positive about the president. and the president didn t revoke a security clearance, then we d have a serious question. it s the content of the information. sean: this is such an egregious abuse. you recognize anyone with common sense recognizes no cia employee can t act this way. let me go to david. i want to stay on this firewall issue, firewalls plural. i cannot imagine why a christopher steele is in contact. 70 plus times, at least that we know of with bruce ohr. the things that they are talking
dreamed about firing the special counsel, mueller would prosecute him for obstruction of justice. sean: let me go to david, i agree, this is juvenile. the idea that maybe the president thought, okay, i have a lot of thoughts about some people. a lot of which are meaningless if they do not follow any action whatsoever. the questions are problematic on a number of levels, what they make here slim and clear is a following that we have said over and over and over again. if there is one agenda here. that is to get the president before mr. mueller enabled to charge him with extraction of justice or perjury. they are considering the mueller bill must really rethink that. to this is the wrong time, and besides the encroachment on article two, and it is certainly that, it never should be considered. mr. comey in hers demand his book tour made clear with these