the guy can t catch a break. more coming. but he should have remembered that he quoted arthur vandenburg, he dumped all over obama and said he s not an american because he doesn t understand we re different than zimbabwe and those other countries. and all those other countries in the alphabet. let s take a look at this whole question here are the other gop people this week going after obama s libya policy starting with newt and palin. here was sarah palin speaking about the president s policy on libya. the u.s. has a tradition, of course, of americans as we travel to foreign soil. we don t criticize our president s foreign policy, even as friendly as soil as india is, i won t criticize what his foreign policy has been but to answer your question, certainly there would have been more decisiveness, less dithering. more decisiveness. she didn t dither long. before she attacked the guy on foreign soil. she went as far as india to attack çhim. that s pretty foreign.
as friendly as soil as india is, i won t criticize what his foreign policy has been but to answer your question, certainly there would have been more decisiveness, less dithering. she didn t dither long. vandenburg s policy has long been jettisoned. it s all a seamless thing. that was true, the republicans when bush was in office, they politicized it themselves as part of their campaign policy in the last decade. and the democrats respond in kind. and that s the way it is. so if you re going criticize them for something go ahead and do it. that s okay. that doesn t matter any more. don t say it s because he s somehow fundamentally weird on america. he doesn t love our country. think it s true that the obama administration had been divided and confused, leading up
certainly there would have been more decisiveness, less dithering, more decisiveness. okay. she said she wouldn t criticize a sitting president even while overseas, but sarah palin did just that, slamming the president s libya response claiming it was dithering. it was of course during a paid speech in india. pay slin on a rare five day foreign tour. is she trying to burnish her foreign policy credentials for a possible presidential rain? jeanne cummings joining us. she was in india, she slammed the president. then she arrived in israel. she ll be having dinner tonight with prime minister netanyahu. it s a strange concurrence of travel schedule. absolutely. and it strikes to be just like
prestigious group in front of india s elite. she was paid for that and she decided on her own to go to israel. but she certainly made some news there in india, not only saying that there s no rush for her to decide, but she also once again blamed the media for her mistreatment. she says she doesn t play the victim card, and then she went after president barack obama on libya. she was specifically asked how she would deal differently with libya and she said, well, we have a tradition in the united states of not criticizing foreign leaders when we travel overseas, and then she did that and accused of president of dithering on libya. we ve got that sound bite. let s play it for our viewers. the u.s. has a tradition, of course, of americans, as we travel to foreign soil, we don t criticize our president s foreign policy, even as friendly as soil as india is. i won t criticize what his foreign policy has been but to answer your question, certainly there would have been more decisiveness