Face is often that there are we have to look at these problems not only from the question of, heres a new service, such as maybe being used by initially by a small slays of the population that has certain selfregulating characteristics to it. When you think about a Regulatory Regime that will apply not only to what exists today but with what comes after it. How these individual services revolve, what new services are created in the same space. So theyre there needs to be an openedminedness on the part of local governments and also a measure of caution that says what works for Transportation Company x may actually turn out to not be sufficiently protective of the Public Interests when it comes to Transportation Company y that starts up next week. So, i think thats the balance we have but we certainly found that most of the companies in the space have been very open to working with us at the local level and its a dialogue that the city of austin at least is very open to having. Adam cono
Together and its not going to look like these old models of lobbying, and i tell you what that looks like inside congress is this tendency to use a Campaign Technology for governing and what its doing is making governing look like campaigning. I think people who look at congress can see this. It cant be petition sites and cant be like the correspondence Management System of congress sorts sentiment, not substance. Unless we figure out a way to privilege certain kinds of information that match institutional functions, like the subcommittee institutionally responsible for . That is the information it needs at the right time for authentic high reputation sources. So its this kind of like my dream is that were going to move toward a future where this community that has largely commercial interests in the space, reserves or helps create some new rules because i feel like every single time its these process rules that are just missing and they really dont exist right now for civic social nor