Any other questions . Thats the model there. If its light enough to if i can make mention about the model as part of your decision today you are waving two requirements, one is to have this model redone. This is the model that was done previously. The only difference here is i dont know what the scale is but a quarter inch. This is a three 3 story model and also since they are at the construction document stage which is more in Design Development, these four stages of design, we are going to wave that they have to come back with a Design Development to staff since its a less detailed document construction. I just wanted to mention the model that there are no changes. Okay. Thank you, the only comment that i would like to make for the record that when we heard the report on sbe participation and nb e participation that bernard came up with the last report, when we got the annual report, kudos to leonardcious sounds like things are moving. Its in the right direction, i think it was 92 pe
Additional more than budgeted and that cost was 66,841. The second category is for preconstruction costs with the Transportation Authority and their consultants to coordinate the specifications to new caltrans standards and coordinate the requirements from the city departments that are affected. That cost is 77,787. The next category is just the amount of the contract. The Transportation Authority did a public procurement and received five bids. The award to the lowest responsible bidder was in excess of 180,000 above the amount budgeted. This category alone depleted the project reserves by over 70 . The final no, the next category is for cost over runs during construction from staffing and from unanticipated expenses due to a traffic signal coordination, manmade bird objects and relocating a bus stop that affected this project. These additional inspection fees and related costs make this category an additional 33,698 and the final category is for project reserves and this is the mecha
Additional more than budgeted and that cost was 66,841. The second category is for preconstruction costs with the Transportation Authority and their consultants to coordinate the specifications to new caltrans standards and coordinate the requirements from the city departments that are affected. That cost is 77,787. The next category is just the amount of the contract. The Transportation Authority did a public procurement and received five bids. The award to the lowest responsible bidder was in excess of 180,000 above the amount budgeted. This category alone depleted the project reserves by over 70 . The final no, the next category is for cost over runs during construction from staffing and from unanticipated expenses due to a traffic signal coordination, manmade bird objects and relocating a bus stop that affected this project. These additional inspection fees and related costs make this category an additional 33,698 and the final category is for project reserves and this is the mecha
And robs authority and we are asking for a prepayment authorized by the state department of finance to be spent at the rops 1415a period and the second bullet point on this slide is for an update to the sbe and the work force participation. The sbe goals for this project are 50 and the Transportation Authority is right there at 50 . For work force the Transportation Authority is using the citys local hire policy which is 30 level, and they are currently at 25 . S stea ooci and oewd will work with the contractor to ensure that the goals or levels have been met, so this concludes staff presentation. There is liz rutman from the Transportation Authority is here and were happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you. Do you have any speaker cards . I have one speaker card. Mr. Ace washington. Okay. Maybe i should have been a lawyer and went to school and being educated and maybe i would be respected but i am here talking about these projects that youre talking about. If i had
County Transportation Authority related to this off ramp work. This work is necessary as you know as we reentering into Development Agreements with developers along folsom and in particular this particular site is for the transbay block eight which were scheduled to close on with related later this year so this realignment work that the ta is conducting on our behalf is critical to that and these are additional costs associated with that and we expect to come back with likely another amendment after this, but were bringing this item before you now with a first time and we have representatives here to go over this and from the Transportation Authority as well here. Thank you executive director bohee. Acting president and commissioners i am kevin mo suita and an emergenc engineer and i this is an amendment with the San Francisco Transportation Authority for the folsom street offramp realignment project. The mol som off ramp from highway 80 curvings diagally across block eight. In order t