take the clicker. see this right here . y okay, i have no idea how to do it here . just making this up as we go along then you hit record and then ask you a question. all right. one time only or que every epis. all right. every episode of the angry man o go oh god. okay, yeah. . i hear your producers laughing in the background all laughing because it s easy. they re laughing at youy and e because we re hilarious.me all right. we love your show. we love you. we ll see you tomorrow. all right. i m laura ingraham. this is ingraham angle from washington tonight . writes for all that s the focus of tonight s angle now it wasn t until about 1992 when i began my clerkship for justice clarence thomas for thai really began to pay attention to how the media writes about the supreme court s. so i m talking about the new york times and the washingtonew post y time magazine, newsweek, et cetera. television reporters 90% of them believe that the court rulings were radical and outside the
were authorized to carry a weapon concealed in the city. now john schuyler chambers, a lawyer who helped s a lot of new yorkers get these gun permits for more than twomi decades now said that they can get their own security. but with the internet, it s much easier to find peoplee they don t want to find someone on their lawn at 5:00 in the morning. okay,he from just that comment. we see the absurdity in this new york law. democrats as usual, kater to the elites because they re the only ones who have a legitimatehe o concern about n intruder showing up at their homes or threatening them in public when another reason you know,c the security court was right is by the silliness of the dissent. and justice breyer, of course, is retiring rathers than addressing the plain language and the historical circumstancea that inform the words of the second amendment. he discussed tor gun suicides