Seems to largely copy without getting anything so the treaty could be constitutional but implementing legislation adds nothing is constitutional. I would quarrel with your premise. It is through the convention in the statute used similar terms and terminology. Theres one important difference between the convention and the statute that differentiates the case and the difference is convention itself doesnt directly regulate individual conduct at all. And so all the convention tells the States Parties go regulate individual conduct in exactly the way this convention regulates state parties. And then what the legislation does is as Justice Ginsberg said just mirrored the convention as the convention contemplated. Taking quite precise with the convention says and this is article vii section i 33 a of the blue brief appendix what it says is each nation status on the convention agrees in accordance with its constitutional processes to pass penal laws that make unlawful for individuals, conduc
Founders to justify their own meanspirited, short down, pro shutdown ideology. What senator cruise doesnt understand is the patriots he founded New Hampshire, the patriots he founded maryland did not pray for their president to fail, they prayed for their president to succeed. [applause] delivernt intelligence, they didnt belittle earnings. They actually aspired to it and they hoped others would as well. They did not appeal to americas fears, they brought forward bravery and they would never have abandoned the war on war on to declare a women, war on workers, war on immigrants, a war on the sick, and a war on hungry children. [applause] i know that people like mitch inell and kelly ayotte know they have been trying to distance themselves from the tea party ever since they nearly drove our country into default. But the truth is, sadly, there is very little difference today between the tea party and so called mainstream republicans. Just ask terrell shea porter. Just ask annie custer. Th
Being prepare so there will be one narrative of history, know that the british, the french, the americans, the chinese, fought against the nazis nazis and the japanese imperialism in world war ii, and you have people who are part of the establishment, like andre, the political scientist who was planted in new york as a representative of the institute for democracy and Something Else, the russian government funded operation, says, oh, but hitler was good until 1939. Until 1939, that included the nuremberg laws, the austria, czechoslovakia, and the so, you have the grandson of your colleague saying, oh, the aryan slavic tribes the narrative is becoming more and more racist, nazilike, justifying even hitler, which is inconceivable in this myth of fighting german fascism. Whats going on with that . The people whom you mentioned, they can justify whatever they have been told to justify. Who is telling them to justify that . I think we know their instinct. They just want to please the chief,
Weekend, every weekend on cspan 3. Many things occurred in this building within these halls that afebruaryed mississippis history and made us what we are today. From 1839 to 1903 this building served as Mississippi State house which was the witness of many important laws passed, visits by important statesmen across the south. A lot of important events took place here. For instance, mississippi seceded from the union in this building in 1861. Passed our last two state constitutions even the one thats in exit tense today passed in 1890s. Most of our colleges and schools were charted from this union. Granted laws that gave rights and took away many of those rights. Mississippi is where it is today due to the events that took place here. We are standing inside the build a hi toric preservation gallery where we discuss a number of issues. For instance greek revival architecture. Very much a symmetrical building with beautiful columns. A great rotunda and dome and. We have nickels. Who is th
Alwaysine viewers are invited to send questions or comments. Hosting the discussion is elizabeth slatterly. Her research focuses on issues such as the scope of the constitutions Commerce Clause, federal exemption, and election laws. She studies about the Supreme Court, judicial confirmations, the proper roles of the courts, and judicial interpretation. She is regularly contributing to a post on a heritage policy blog. Please join me in welcoming elizabeth slatterly. Elizabeth . [applause] thank you, john. Tomorrow morning the Senate Judiciary committee will hold a hearing on a constitutional amendment that would give congress the power to regulate raising and spending of money in elections. Say amending the constitution is necessary to get dark money out of politics and to stop billion theres from allegedly billionaires from allegedly buying elections. The Supreme Court has determined that bans on money are bans on money are bands on speech. Anyone with experience in running campaignsm