assumptions of the battle that proved not to be true? men fought to the death to protect what was theres in little big horn and last week in washington, republicans launched a fight that was not a plan of the battle tested generals but rather a plan of the newest recruits. blame the press, the establishment, the liberals, blame one s own team the charge up the hill for a great cause but without following the counsel of jesus who admonished to count the cost before starting a war. but liberalism is not destroying the republican party. that is not liberalism. there are no republican congressional liberals. legalism, not liberalism is dividing the gop. now see what legalism does to the church. it is focusing more on how one
the liberal might abandon the truth but the legalist abandoned bibliical love. the facility of the church becomes a focus fellowship of the church. legalist fight for a artificial purity based on the truth. for them that is the way they do church more than the spirit with which they do. it it is an arrogant and prideful self righteousness that focuses on self than focusing on christ. legalism fight over the color of choir robe cans temple of hems and architecture. for the ph a ra sees. what one doeses is better. some people oat their soup louder than others. but it doesn t mean the soup tastes better. legalism in the republican party is complaining that it is
that proved not to be true. in the alamothey fought to the death. republicans launched the plan that was not of battle tested generals but newest rekrauts. blame the press and liberals and one s own team was the analysis of those who thought it wise to charge up the hill but without following the counsel of jesus who admonished to count the cost before starting a law. liberalism is not destroying the republican party. compared to the most conservative democrats there are no republican congressional liberals. legalism and not liberalism is devoiding the gop. i have sewn what legalism did to the church. focusing on how they express one s belief than what they believe. the liberal might abandon the
that proved not to be true. in the alamothey fought to the death. republicans launched the plan that was not of battle tested generals but newest rekrauts. blame the press and liberals and one s own team was the analysis of those who thought it wise to charge up the hill but without following the counsel of jesus who admonished to count the cost before starting a law. liberalism is not destroying the republican party. compared to the most conservative democrats there are no republican congressional liberals. legalism and not liberalism is devoiding the gop. i have sewn what legalism did to the church. focusing on how they express one s belief than what they believe. the liberal might abandon the
irretrievable political failure. but as it turns out that the bad handling of the administration in dealing with the shutdown, how you administer the shutdown may trump anything we saw from congress as they were engaged in their internal fights over the president s health law. this is really, really bad and for this not to have been resolved, and as ed henry points out, an administration that expressly ignores laws that it finds inconvenient from time to time as every administration does, this administration does to a greater degree than others, to stand on legalism for not funding funerals for people killed in combat on behalf of the united states is so heinous that they have opened the door wide for criticism about the way the president s team is handling this. martha: chris, this isn t going to go away. no. martha: the congress was under the impression, the john boehner was under the impression this