be a general kelly white house? jonathan s reporting tonight is spot-on in terms of the influences on this president. the new york times is out as well with a similar report. at the end of the day, it is a litmus test. listen, general kelly and general mcmaster, if you listen to mcmaster when he talked to your colleague chuck todd on sunday, those are the reasoned, balanced voices of this administration. there is no room in a reasoned, balanced white house for a steve bannon. it will be a leadership decision for the president and one that he fails if bannon still has a place to call home in the white house. gentlemen, our great thanks to you both. congressman david jolly, jonathan lamire. another break for us on a busy monday. and up next how and where the mueller investigation is moving right now when the 11th hour continues.
bannon has cautioned the president not to criticize far right activists too severely as a small and energetic part of his base, but what once endeared him to the president has now become a major liability. david? this is a leadership test for donald trump. we know that this is a litmus test. is it going to be a steve bannon white house or is it going the be a general kelly white house? jonathan s reporting tonight is spot-on in terms of the influences on this president. the new york times is out as well with a similar report. at the end of the day, it is a litmus test. listen, general kelly and general mcmaster, if you listen to mcmaster when he talked to your colleague chuck todd on sunday, those are the reasoned, balanced voices of this administration. there is no room in a reasoned, balanced white house for a steve bannon. it will be a leadership decision for the president and one that he fails if bannon still has a place to call home in the white house. gentlemen, our great t
entire globe. what we do is we try to apply those resources in a way that is risk-based and focused on the threat. i don t understand what don t have the context for what dr. gorka was speaking to a moment ago but i will double down and be very clear and direct with you for a fourth time that the violence we saw yesterday is unacceptable. there is no equivocation in my mind, in my voice or in my eyes. so if i haven t made it clear enough to you, i ll answer it a fifth time and i ll do it all day. but i think what s important for you and your viewers to understand is that the president feels that way as well. i think what you are trying to get at and what you are trying to drive here is why the president didn t say something different. or say something more. i believe that the subset of all the groups and all of the people who might justify their insanity or violence are covered by the president s clear denunciation yesterday and i think declaring racial bigotry unacceptable is a very
what we have done is try to apply the resources in a way that is risk-based and focused on the threat. i don t understand what and i don t have the context for what he was speaking to a moment ago. but i will double down and be very clear and direct with you for a fourth time that the violence we saw yesterday is unacceptable. there is no equivocation in my mind, in my voice or in my eyes. if i haven t made it clear enough to you. i will answer it a fifth time and i will do it all day. what is important for you and your viewers to understand, the president feels that way, as well. what you re trying to get at and what you re trying to drive here is why the president didn t say something different or say something more. i believe that the subset of all the groups and all the people who might justify their insanity or violence are covered by the president s cleared denunciation yesterday and declaring racial bigotry unacceptable is a very smart and calming thing for the president to do
conference, the central key is focusing on lowering premiums. and you do that through expanding consumer freedom. i would note the current senate bill, not only does it have the consumer freedom bill that i drafted, in addition to that it also allows people to pay health insurance premiums from health savings accounts. that is a big, big deal. that s illegal under current law. what that means for millions of merks is your rates drop 3040% because you re paying with pretax dollars. if we keep focusing on lowering premiums that was a leadership decision. it may be better question for mitch mcconnell. did the president again mention that was senator ted cruz talking to reporters about the healthcare bill and how they need to get something done. bill, you re still with me. what do you think of this?