Absolutely. Again, when there is some things that the president agencies can do redirecting money they already have. On can Start Construction expansion of the border wall, hire a few Border Patrol agents, but these are big ticket items, the border wall is president rump initially estimated it would cost 10 billion to complete, that number has been ncreasing, the department of homeland security, was a estim cost 21 billion, definitely need funding from on that one. Hiring ice agents, Border Patrol agents are not low, full. Hiring funding, without starting with building more immigration jails, immigration judges, so these are tens of billions of ollars worth of projects hes trying to do, there is some he can do on his own, redirect money, for vast majority, he needs help from congress. Through order and impact, special line in this recent immigrants, 2027488920 if you want to call in. 2027488001. Ecent immigrants, democrats, 2027488000. Independents, 2027488002. Lets get to calls. Here
Members, is a reflection of the frustration that we have had and the complete insistence that we cannot go through another moment of silence without taking action. Moment of silence just left there is a moment of denial of the need to do something more. So i think that youll see more spontaneity as to the form things will take. On the floor of the house we were responding in terms of the maloney amendment, and by the way the maloney amendment for those who dont know, president obama issued an executive order enabling lgbt, otherwise qualified lgbt companies to participate in government contracts. Republicans put in their bill a reversal of that. Codifying discrimination in fact. We won on the floor to remove that. Until they reversed the vote. And thats when the activism started. We didnt go to the floor intending to do anything except hopefully win the vote. But when they in a very contrary to regular order way did what they did, then that evoked a response. So again, its the setting
Losses in 1995, which may have allowed him to avoid paying personal income tax for 18 years. We are asking our viewers whether Donald Trumps tax History Matters to you. Does his background as a businessman make a difference in how you would you those returns . If you are a donald trump supporter, 202 7488001. HIllary Clinton supporters, 202 7488000. Thirdparty supporter, 202 7488002. If you are undecided, 202 7488003. You can catch up with us on social media, on twitter, on facebook. A very good sunday morning to you. Were taking you right to the lead story in the New York Times. Declared a 916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years. Records obtained by the New York Times noted that although Donald Trumps taxable income is yet unknown, a 916 million loss in 1995 would have been large enough to write off for the 50 million a year in taxable income over 18 years. The story g
[speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] cspan, created by americas Cable Television companies and brought to you as a Public Service by your cable or satellite provider. The annual red mass was held at the cathedral of Saint Matthew the apostle in washington. The service is traditionally held on the sunday before the start of the Supreme Court costs new term. It brings together members of the court and Public Officials involved with the law for blessings and guidance. Here is a look at some of those attending the mass this morning. Cspans washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. Coming up monday morning, writers Supreme Court correspondent Lawrence Hurley reviews upcoming cases of the
Of their speeches one day before the Vice President ial debate. Does the vacancy on the court, as well as pastoral potential future decisions past or potential future decisions affect your decision . Republicans, call 202 7488001 , democrats, call 202 7488000. Independents, call 202 7488002. If you are a member of a third party, call 202 7488003. You can send us a tweet, cspanwj, or join us on facebook. We are keeping an eye on the Supreme Court as oral arguments begin this week. Yesterday was the traditional red mass in washington, d. C. The is the headline from Weekend Edition of usa today, the court on the brink of transformation. Actions president s could bring on monumental shifts in legal owner stones. From harry reid and Mitch Mcconnell on america garland on the Merrick Garland nomination. Give us a call. David savage of the l. A. Times, is writing about this. , dividedhe headline Supreme Court opens a new term that could bring a historic shift. He says and evenly divided Suprem