you decide year whether you want the deuce used tore political purposes or use the money yourself. what is wrong with that choice? is that anti-union? no, it isn t. it s giving americas a choice. that s what it s about. i suspect rick ungar wants to tell us what is wrong with that. if tharpe the days, the federal court would not have strict than part of the law steve is referring to this week, returning the deuce collectability back to the unions. let s lose the spin. here is what the agenda is really about. if scott walker was really worrying about the taxpayers, he would have said yes when the public unions came to him to accept the deal he offered them, but before walker pushed through his anti-collective bargaining legislation. he wasn t interested in waiving money there. if he was interesting in saving money, he wouldn t have exempted certain public unions from the anti-collective bargaining bill, and if he was interesting in saving taxpayer money, then he would not have given