would pay instead of, you know, spreading wealth based on need. money woulneedd be allocated to individuals purely based on the issue of race. racnow, the premise, according to the left, would be to compensate for the evils oflavey slavery. now, first, the country billn simply cannot afford the billions and billions of dollars and trillion s of dollars that it would likely take to allocate and ultimatelyn ,i t is a punitive measure and one that will even furthervi dividede a country thaty deep is already deeply divided. those who support reparationly o believe that america is an evile country filled to the brim with generous notions of bad people. and while no intelligent perso n ,let me be clear, deniese the evils of slavery, it wouldnl be a great injustice to ignore all the progress this country has made on racial issues and other issues. which is the beauty o our great constitution. it has provide d all of us a roadmap that we can right wrongs and correct injustices. o
sounds a lot like the democratic party of eighteen sixty three . just listen to some of those clips you played using short term economic justifications to justify illegal and immoralwd behavior. nee the vegetables will rot ind the field. we need people to pluck our crops. this is thsayinge thin ig thatuy democrats were saying in the south in the 1860 to justify a different form of immoral and illegal behavior in the form of slaverf immoray. ts nobew they re using that justification for illegal immigrants to be able to turn the other way and abandoned the rule of law.se to st sean , i refuse to stand by ando watch this idl ty and actually go into the south side of chicago. fridaon friday. not a popular stop for many republicans on a campaign trail ,but america first includes all americans . and even though that is s aae black community that mostly votes democrat on the south side of chicago, they to they a plagued by the same trend where high schools are being taken over and turned into