why is the president getting in this fight? i m not sure the judge should have done this. it s kind of a stunt, but the president endangered the public s imagination of himself. a former law profession. constitutional lawyer. who gave himself i think to the public as a man of level of dignity and level of decorum. now he has taken on the supreme court publicly. more than once. you may recall in the state of the union address in 2010 where he stood there with the supreme court justices listening quietly and respectfully and he talked about the citizen united case, allowing corporate money to be used not indirectly for the political campaign but in political campaigning in a way that hasn t been trueed before. they overturned 100 years of precedent which is not true. he said also in the speech that the court had allowed attorney money in our campaigns also was not foreign money in our campaign, also not true. he should know better than
why is the president getting in this fight? i m not sure the judge should have done this. it s kind of a stunt, but the president endangered the public s imagination of himself. a former law profession. constitutional lawyer. who gave himself i think to the public as a man of level of dignity and level of decorum. now he has taken on the supreme court publicly. more than once. you may recall in the state of the union address in 2010 where he stood there with the supreme court justices listening quietly and respectfully and he talked about the citizen united case, allowing corporate money to be used not indirectly for the political campaign but in political campaigning in a way that hasn t been trueed before. they overturned 100 years of precedent which is not true. he said also in the speech that the court had allowed attorney money in our campaigns also was not foreign money in our campaign, also not true. he should know better than
why is the president getting in this fight? i m not sure the judge should have done this. it s kind of a stunt, but the president endangered the public s imagination of himself. a former law profession. constitutional lawyer. who gave himself i think to the public as a man of level of dignity and level of decorum. now he has taken on the supreme court publicly. more than once. you may recall in the state of the union address in 2010 where he stood there with the supreme court justices listening quietly and respectfully and he talked about the citizen united case, allowing corporate money to be used not indirectly for the political campaign but in political campaigning in a way that hasn t been trueed before. they overturned 100 years of precedent which is not true. he said also in the speech that the court had allowed attorney money in our campaigns also was not foreign money in our campaign, also not true. he should know better than
mater, there was too much thinking on one side of the ledger. she thought of that by bringing in other faculty member points of view. it was a contentious time at harvard as the first woman. she had a lot to break through there, the traditional barriers in academics as well as in the law profession and she did it very, very successfully whereof. we should point out not only did he paint her as a trailblazer for women in the community but talked about if she s confirmed there will be the first time ever three women at the same time on the supreme court which does break another barrier. still not equal representation for women here in america but closer than any other branch of government. i think it s a significant factor. it certainly had to be one of the things he had in mind. ken strickland, obviously andrea brought up this is a political campaign. this the first day of a campaign. we heard the president and elena kagan prcategorkagan frame thei the confirmation.
you know, that s not the only institution that is let me down. what about the law profession? davis, cohen and evan eddie, the student brothers, larry davis, mo: and curly. what a law office that would be? there must be a flood because i m seeing a lot of dirtbags. [laughter] now you can t trust adult film stars and you can t even trust lawyers. next, your tummy i can trust the natural inquirer. we need a better class of people or lawyers. it s time for legal heroes. got a problem that can only be solved by people who have had years of experience in dangerous situations? call the offices of terry shepard and mike baker, one was a green beret and the other cia.