even under their plans, they are not proposing that everyone who comes across the english channel goes to rwanda. i think their estimates are round about 20 30%. so i am afraid it will not be a deterrent, it will not work, it probably will be abandoned and it will cost the uk taxpayer millions and millions of pounds. one application the court ruled on was brought by an iraqi man who arrived in the uk a month ago. doctors say he may have been the victim of torture. he was told his asylum claim was inadmissible. his lawyers say it is open to the government to argue before the court in strasbourg if it wants to overturn the decision, or it can change the law in the uk. alternatively, you could do what you should do in a democracy, what you are expected to do, and put through a law, put the matter to parliament, and have statute that would approve
will cost the uk taxpayer millions and millions of pounds. 0ne application the court ruled on was brought by an iraqi man who arrived in the uk a month ago. doctors say he may have been the victim of torture. he was told his asylum claim was inadmissible. his lawyers say it is open to the government to argue before the court in strasbourg if it wants to overturn the decision, or it can change the law in the uk. alternatively, you could do what, in a democracy, it might be expected to do, and put through a law, put the matter to parliament, and have a statute that would approve and embody its policy, which would be fully debated in parliament and the courts could not then touch it. is it time for the uk to withdraw from the european court of human rights, prime minister? that idea, withdrawing from the convention and courts that enshrine and uphold fundamental
agreement, the divorce treaty of which the protocol is parked. as far as i m aware, member states have asked the commission to make sure those plans are dusted down and brought out if the bill goes ahead. if the eu does nothing and simply let this bill take its course and thenit let this bill take its course and then it becomes domestic law in the uk, that means you have an entirely different one sided regime operating in northern ireland when it comes to goods moving in from the great britain and it would not be the effective control and risk analysis of where those goods end up as far as the eu is concerned, and if there is a risk of them entering the single market that puts pressure on ireland and the eu to start doing those checks somewhere and we go back to square one from 2016 where the whole point was to avoid having those checks on the land border and if those checks, for example, happened in the celtic sea between
correspondent jonathan blake. what is the new deal? how parliament is responding? no new dimple with the government is proposing no new dimple with the government is proposing to do is put forward legislation which would become law in the legislation which would become law in the uk legislation which would become law in the uk that would allow it to get round in the uk that would allow it to get round some of the trickier bits of the northern ireland protocol that are causing problems. but the response are causing problems. but the response has varied. some say this is a blatant response has varied. some say this is a blatant breach or would be a blatant is a blatant breach or would be a blatant breach of international law and completely goes against everything that the uk signed up to woody everything that the uk signed up to woody agreed the post brexit deal with brussels and the eu. labour are saying with brussels and the eu. labour are saying the with brussels an
election on, what are the options for the eu to retaliate? for the eu to retaliate? i think they would for the eu to retaliate? i think they would wait for the eu to retaliate? i think they would wait to for the eu to retaliate? i think they would wait to see - for the eu to retaliate? i think they would wait to see what i for the eu to retaliate? i think - they would wait to see what exactly is proposed by way of legislation. then we have to see how it evolves, because legislation has to go through the machinery of westminster, through the house of commons, through the house of lords, where it would face some opposition, and it could take quite a long time for this to happen. there s also a suspicion in brussels and other national capitals that this is really about boris johnson shoring really about borisjohnson shoring up really about borisjohnson shoring up his own really about boris johnson shoring up his own political position with his own. this narrative may have some twis