the attack is a baseless one. chuck schumer himself years ago raised sonia sotomayor for ruling against sympatheticch litigants when their claims were weak. and that s exactly what judge gorsuch has done. he has ruled based on the law.go sometimes the little guy wins and he ll be able to cite plenty of cases when he s ruled for the little guy, sometimes the little guy loses. that s called the rule of law, and it s something that chuck schumer and others on the left, unfortunately, are seeing fit to attack. paul: where else do you think,w. where else in the hearings do you think democrats will try to undermine judge gorsuch s supportsome where are they going to attack him? well, i think they re going to try to say that he s no different from donald trump and try to fault him for whatever they see to be president trump s faults. i don t think that gets you anywhere paul: right. one tried the same with previous presidents paul: they re going to go after
fanfare in the last few states that did it. this is the wave of the future, letting folks love each other and commitment to each other for a lifetime because they care about each other is going to be the standard for marriage in this country. if arizona let s that law go into place, they are going to alienate hundreds and hundreds and thousands of arizona folks who are working hard in that state to create jobs as wells the other states will look at them and say what s going on in arizona? i think the days of discrimination are over and i really hope that governor brewer does the right thing. thank you so much. vermont leading the way, governor shumlin, thanks. saturday night live veteran seth myers had john kerry rooting for him last night as he debuted on late night. the secretary of state tweelted this picture of seth myers playing kerry during his failed 2004 presidential campaign, with the message good luck tonight, you ve come a long way since
immigration. the hope on what is a really troubling day for the country. the voting rights act is a crowned jewel. the hope is people will say voting is a fundamental right. that will light a fire under people in a way that s different. what do you think this means for state and local laws? the r the recent voter i.d. laws that have not received justice approval. i think we ll see more of those. the impediment was that they were in covered jurisdictions. therefore before you made any kind of change that made the law go in that direction you have to go to washington. now you no longer need to go to washington if you re in one of those jurisdictions. we ll see a speak in those laws in the future. i m learning that eric holder will be making a statement at the top of the hour at noontime. we ll have that in reference to the supreme court voting down a
a high court is nearing the end of a remarkable six hours of arguments on four separate issues arising from the affordable care act of 2010. the session that began last hour is due to wrap up 45 minutes from now. soon after that the final health care arguments will center on the power of the feds to compel states to broaden medicaid coverage. we don t expect any decisions until june at the earliest, but our jeff toobin and kate baldwin will step out of the courthouse to bring us up to speed when the what if arguments are over today at the u.s. supreme court. the facts surrounding trayvon martin s death are getting more complicated by the day. so far there have been conflicting reports as to what exactly happened and whether george zimmerman was really acting in self-defense when he shot trayvon martin in the chest. now shocking new evidence that sanford police were taking steps to arrest zimmerman early in the investigation. the miami herald reports the police incident re
as you can see here with nra lobbyist mary ann deamer peering down his neck as he signed it. two other states have laws similar to familiar and the nra wants a flal law to force this on states around the country that don t want it. that s the way gun politics works, all the i think whats of law go in the same direction. all the changes in law go towards more guns in more places and more legal excuses for shooting people. and once one state stakes out what used to be radical ground in terms of clearing the way for more guns and legal excuses for shooting, once one state clear that is ground like florida in 2005, as soon as one state goes there, all the other states rush toward the newly-cleared ground. i was one of the people that thought after tucson, we could have one tiny little tick toward regulating just the size of the magazines for ammunition in the handguns. as a tiny correction for a nation that was legit gnatly