judges. inside and outside the government jones, day had done as much as any private institution to help trump and his in ministration. it wasn t just defending the campaign against the mueller investigation, and it wasn t just mcgahn s herculean efforts to protect the president from ending up in court. once they had done a smorgasbord of [inaudible] the consumer product safety commission and of course the justice department, which had been transformed into a political pundit of the white house. the relationship between the two enemies, the trump administration and the law form of john s day, is unlike anything we ve ever seen for many big law form from any other other presidential administration. and just four years, jones day wedded itself to trump and its movement. he represented trump from s for stopping votes being counted.
why haven t you filed? let s name names. let s name names because you do very clearly in this book. you talk about these tweets from donald trump about john kerry. the tweet was in the morning, that afternoon ferreira got a call from a justice, he was told a david burns, the principal deputy assistant attorney general for national security wanted to know we had delayed. we have not proceeded to the order to look into carries electronic communications. so david burns who was doing exactly what should never be done by any just apartment official is now very happily employed in a very rewarding law form as you he probably will be for the rest of his life, and these kinds of people which in your book i m getting the sense or perhaps a dozen or so in main justice we re doing these things seemingly every day. just in your district, and you are one out of 91 districts
her it s notable that they confirmed that in this filing that they did try to relay a message to the attorney general who signed off on the search warrant. stay with us, caitlin, i want to bring our political analyst maggie haberman, cnn contributor and john dean former federal judge, nancy - harvard law school. judge, let s start with you. how unusual requests for a special master two weeks into, after new that like this? it would be very unusual to do it two weeks after. as it was said, the government s been going through these documents. it s usually done in a situation where the search of a law form, where the documents are presumptively privilege. because they ve been in a law firm and we say you don t want the government to be going through attorney-client privilege documents. this is the reverse and away. if the coverage is right, these are presumptively presidential records, not privileged and so the notion that you need a special master to win your way through what is pres
mother. they are cooperating and they don t have a person of interest because they don t of a crime. casey stegall has the latest from texas. good evening, it s been ten days since anyone has heard from or seen 38-year-old christine or chrissy powell. the mother of two works as a paralegal in a san antonio law form and they say that powell never showed up for work on jul. after calling saying that she was running late and still on her way in. a doorbell camera captures the moment powell sprinted out the front door of her home around 10:30 a.m., got into her black nissan rogue, then vanished. the unknown is just of the scariest part. it s been hard to wrap our minds around where she might be, what could ve happened. investigators say she left her cell phone and her smartwatch behind, as well as medication for undisclosed medical conditions that she had been diagnosed with and was being treated for under the care of a
remember, horowitz made referrals and nobody followed up on them, the very same things other people had, you know, early morning raids on their home with guns drawn and even fake news cnn cameras in some cases, but the question here you have hillary clinton and her influence over the dnc, they funnel money to a law form, perkins coie, that hires fusion gps, that hired christopher steele. that creates a series of documents now known as the dossier. then the dossier is used. now the question is, is durham getting to the raw nerve or the intersection that matters here? and that is of this was all drummed up by hillary and all spread out by her supporters. knowing none of it was verified or verifiable. in other words, was it a live from the beginning, who knew what and when? what did they know and when did they know it?