and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. republicans say you haven t tell your doctor if you ve been to areas brought anybody up yet who said where certain fungal infections are common, and if you ve had tb, hepatitis b, trump says it was a quid pro quo. are prone to infections, my audience knows this, but you ve been busy to watch, i m or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don t start humira if you have an infection. sure. i don t believe you need a quid pro quo. i don t think this is a legal be there for you, and them. analysis. i don t think there are elements that are to be checked like ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible. boxes in some type of law exam. this is about a political judgment. but even if you did need a quid pro quo, how did you not get it today? yeah. i think we did. but you know what? that s they re throwing up a red herring. who said we need to prove there is a quid pro quo? but by the way, t
all of this. the fact that he denies information to congress to make decisions. the fact that you could say the fact that he uses the power of the presidency to get foreign governments or even the united states air force to patronize his personal properties and put money into his pocket. that s why the emoluments clause was put in the constitution. a case that will be spelli compelling to the american people. this is political judgment. it s not a law exam. it s not in court. it s got to be compelling. you have confidence on timing and substance? i think there is a very good chance that very understandable case will be made that the american people can understand. i appreciate your candor on this. very important, obviously, to
power by the president, the destruction of liberty, the destruction of the separation of powers. that s exactly what this president has been doing through all of this. the fact that he denies information to congress to make decisions. the fact that you could say the fact that he uses the power of the presidency to get foreign governments or even the united states air force to patronize his personal properties and put money into his pocket. that s why the emoluments clause was put in the constitution. a case that will be compelling to the american people. this is political judgment. it s not a law exam. it s not in court. it s got to be compelling. you have confidence on timing and substance? i think there is a very good chance that very understandable case will be made that the american people can understand. i appreciate your candor on this. very important, obviously, to